What do the verified videos of the Alex Pretti shooting show frame by frame?

Checked on January 25, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Verified bystander videos, analyzed frame by frame by multiple outlets, show Alex Pretti standing with a phone, being shoved and then wrestled to the ground by several federal agents, and then being shot while on or near the ground; the footage does not clearly show him brandishing a firearm before the shooting, though some frames later show an agent with an object that could be a handgun (NYT, USA Today, Guardian, BBC, Yahoo) [1][2][3][4][5].

1. The opening frames: Pretti visible holding a phone, not a gun

Early frames captured by multiple bystanders establish Pretti in the street holding up an object consistent with a phone as agents approach; The New York Times’ frame-by-frame visual analysis concluded he was “clearly visible holding a phone” before the physical confrontation began, a finding mirrored by USA Today and other outlets that verified the same clips [1][2].

2. The escalation: shove, fall, and a clustered wrestle

A clearer continuous clip shows an agent shove a nearby person who falls; witnesses and synchronized timelines indicate Pretti moves toward that person, at which point several federal agents converge, pull him down and a close-quarters scuffle ensues with multiple officers grappling him to the pavement — a sequence observed and described in reports from The Guardian, BBC and New York media analyses [3][6][7].

3. The shooting itself: shots fired while Pretti is on the ground

The videos show agents firing multiple rounds during the altercation and after Pretti is on or being forced to the ground; at least one outlet counted ten shots in the footage and observers report the firing occurring while Pretti was restrained or kneeling, which has become a central point of controversy between the visuals and federal statements [8][7].

4. The disputed handgun sequence: ambiguous frames after the shooting

Frame-by-frame scrutiny cited by Yahoo and others identifies a moment in which an agent in a gray coat bends down and later is seen standing with something in his hand that could be a handgun, leading to debate about whether an agent recovered a weapon from Pretti before or after the fatal shots; New York Times and other visual investigators note that available clips do not show Pretti brandishing a gun prior to the shots, and that the sequence of any recovery is indistinct in public footage [5][1].

5. What the videos do not show and competing official claims

The videos do not settle whether Pretti ever presented a weapon in a way that justified lethal force: Department of Homeland Security has asserted Pretti approached agents with a handgun, while agencies and outlets (including CBS/BBC partnerships) acknowledge the gun is not visible in the bystander videos they verified; federal officials cite other evidence not yet publicly available, and media analyses caution that absence of visible proof on camera is not proof of absence but does highlight a mismatch between the visual record and official narrative [9][1][2].

6. Why the frame-by-frame findings matter: accountability and the unsettled timeline

Journalistic synchronization of multiple clips — including work referenced by Bellingcat and aggregated by news outlets — has produced a coherent timeline showing a phone in hand, a defensive or intervening movement toward a shoved bystander, a rapid cluster takedown, and fatal shots as Pretti is restrained; that timeline has fueled political and legal fallout because it appears to contradict initial DHS accounts and raises questions about whether agents recovered or controlled any weapon before the shooting, a question investigators must answer with evidence beyond the publicly available videos [7][1][3].

Want to dive deeper?
What publicly available forensic or body-camera evidence are investigators collecting beyond bystander videos in the Pretti shooting?
How have frame-by-frame open-source analyses changed public investigations of police shootings in recent years?
What are the differences between DHS’s stated account and what synchronized bystander videos show in this case?