Has annette bosworth faced medical license actions or malpractice suits?

1. The 2015 felony convictions triggered state licensing discipline

Bosworth was convicted in 2015 on multiple felony counts tied to filing false or forged instruments related to nominating-petition signatures; the conviction prompted the South Dakota Board of Medical and Osteopathic Examiners to move to revoke her medical license, and the board voted to revoke in September 2015 after hearings that highlighted concerns about truthfulness and public confidence in the profession ^{[2] [1] [6]}.

2. Administrative and federal consequences went beyond state action

Federal administrative review has documented that Bosworth was once enrolled in Medicare but was later excluded from the program in part because she failed to report her convictions to CMS, with the Departmental Appeals Board noting the seriousness of not reporting felony convictions and the implications for trustworthiness in dealings with federal health programs ^[2]. The state’s action was also reported to a federal physician database, which reporting said effectively prevented her from buying malpractice insurance and from billing Medicare or Medicaid while the federal record remained adverse ^[3].

3. A pattern of prior disciplinary contacts with the state board

The state board’s own documents and contemporaneous reporting noted that Bosworth was not new to disciplinary scrutiny: several complaints had been lodged against her previously, she had been placed on probation in earlier board actions, and the hearing record detailed disputes over compliance with mentoring and board orders before the 2015 revocation matter ^{[2] [4] [7]}. Dakota Free Press coverage characterized some prior board friction as stemming from disagreements over mentorship compliance rather than documented clinical incompetence ^[4].

4. Litigation and appeals complicated the outcome, but revocation was sustained in public reporting

Bosworth pursued court appeals of the license revocation and the underlying criminal rulings, and public filings show the revocation was the subject of litigation, including stays and appeals, but mainstream coverage and local press consistently reported the board’s 2015 revocation decision and its rationale linking felony conduct to fitness to practice ^{[7] [1] [6]}.

5. No reliable evidence in supplied sources of malpractice suits

None of the supplied sources documents civil malpractice suits against Bosworth; coverage and administrative filings focus on criminal convictions, professional-licensing discipline, probationary episodes, and federal Medicare exclusion matters rather than negligence claims or malpractice litigation ^{[2] [1] [3]}. It is possible malpractice suits exist outside the provided reporting, but those are not demonstrated by the sources given.

6. Politics and advocacy shaped reporting and public framing

Coverage and commentary around Bosworth’s license issues were entangled with her political profile as a Republican Senate candidate and critics framed prosecution and board action as necessary to protect public trust while supporters sometimes described the legal fights as politically motivated; those competing narratives appear in courtroom argument summaries and op-eds cited in local reporting ^{[1] [4]}. Observers should note that the board’s public safety rationale and opponents’ claims of political targeting are both present in the record and can reflect different institutional incentives: boards guarding professional reputation versus partisan actors seeking to contest enforcement ^{[1] [4]}.

Conclusion: direct answer

Yes — Annette Bosworth has faced substantial medical-license actions, including a 2015 license revocation by the South Dakota medical board (with prior probation and multiple complaints noted) and federal administrative consequences affecting Medicare enrollment and credential reporting ^{[1] [2] [3]}. The supplied sources do not show any malpractice lawsuits; absence of evidence in these sources is not proof none exist, but no malpractice suits are documented in the materials provided ^{[2] [1] [3]}.