Has drugs dropped down from 94% flown in and by sea in the us today
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
There is no authoritative evidence in the provided reporting to support the claim that "94% of drugs [are] flown in and by sea" into the United States today; federal data and agency assessments show a more complex mix of trafficking routes—land, maritime, air, mail and commercial ports of entry—and the percentages vary by drug type and year [1] [2] [3]. Multiple official sources and independent analyses emphasize Mexico and maritime Pacific routes for many wholesale shipments while also documenting large seizures at ports of entry and inland interdictions, undercutting any simple 94% figure attributed solely to air and sea [4] [5] [6].
1. What federal data actually says: mixed routes, no 94% figure
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection drug-seizure dashboard and the DEA’s National Drug Threat Assessment report provide granular, evolving seizure data but do not present a single 94% statistic attributing most illicit supply to air and sea alone; the CBP portal cautions its statistics are extracted from live systems and subject to revision, and the DEA’s NDTA describes multiple trafficking modalities without endorsing a 94% breakdown [1] [2] [7]. The Department of State’s INCSR likewise maps regional flows—pointing to Mexico and Pacific maritime corridors for fentanyl and cocaine movement—rather than claiming a fixed national percentage formed exclusively by air and sea routes [3].
2. Who’s responsible for messaging and political framing
Law enforcement press releases and administration statements often stress high-profile seizures and trends to signal progress; for instance the Justice Department highlighted large DEA seizures and arrests in the first half of 2025, cataloguing millions of fentanyl pills and hundreds of thousands of pounds of other drugs, which underscores interdiction activity but does not translate into a source-split percentage like “94%” [6]. Similarly, partisan or administrative communications—such as a DHS release claiming substantial seizure increases and large drops in southern‑border fentanyl—use selective timeframes to make political points; those releases are useful for seizure totals but are not equivalent to neutral attribution studies of where the overall illicit supply originates [8].
3. Academic and NGO analysis: region-specific flows, not a single national share
Independent analysts and NGOs map supply chains that vary by drug: cocaine historically moves through Caribbean and Pacific maritime routes, synthetic opioids like illicit fentanyl are frequently tied to Mexican processing and overland smuggling into the U.S., and the Eastern Pacific has been flagged as the conduit for a large share of maritime shipments—estimates such as “around 80%” through the Eastern Pacific refer to an operational zone rather than an all-drugs national percentage attributed to air and sea alone [5]. The American Immigration Council and other fact sheets highlight that many seizures happen at legal ports of entry and that everyday cross-border traffic includes enormous volumes of personal vehicles and cargo, reinforcing that legal conveyances and land crossings are central to the picture as well [4].
4. Bottom line, caveats and where to look next
The specific claim that 94% of drugs are flown in and by sea into the U.S. today is not supported by the sources provided; federal datasets and agency threat assessments show a plural landscape of trafficking routes, and available public reporting offers no confirmed 94% attribution to air/sea modalities [1] [2] [3]. Reporting limitations: the supplied documents include seizure dashboards, threat assessments and press releases but do not include any study or data table stating the 94% figure, so this analysis cannot confirm that number and instead points to mixed-route findings and shifting yearly patterns [1] [6] [4]. For a defensible percentage breakdown, consult CBP’s downloadable seizure tables and the DEA/State INCSR quantitative annexes for the latest, drug‑specific flow estimates rather than relying on a single unsourced statistic [1] [2] [3].