Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are minor boys detained with their fathers during ice raids
Executive summary
Available reporting shows that ICE and related DHS enforcement actions have repeatedly resulted in situations where children are present when parents, caregivers, or staff are detained — including incidents at day cares, parking lots, and vehicles — but ICE policy says agents should avoid taking custody of minor children and should arrange for alternative care or remain until child welfare arrives [1] [2]. Multiple news reports and advocacy groups describe children left behind or traumatized during raids; some court rulings and watchdogs question tactics and call out family separations [3] [4] [5].
1. What the records and reporting actually show: children are often present at arrests
Journalists and advocacy groups have documented numerous incidents where minor children were at the scene when a parent, guardian, or child-care worker was detained — for example, a teacher detained inside a Chicago day care while children watched, and reports of children left alone in vehicles after a parent was arrested [1] [4]. Coverage of large city raids likewise notes children and communities shaken by enforcement actions [6] [7].
2. Official policy: ICE says it should not take custody of minor children
ICE policy expressly instructs that “unless ICE is effectuating an enforcement action against the minor child(ren), ICE personnel should not, under any circumstances, take custody of or transport the minor child(ren).” The policy also directs agents to try to let adult detainees arrange alternative care and, if not possible, to stay on site until local child welfare or law enforcement can take custody [2]. Advocacy and legal summaries point to related directives intended to limit disruption to parental rights [8].
3. What happens in practice: gaps between policy and outcomes
Despite policy language, multiple reports document outcomes that show children suddenly without their caregiver after arrests: an advocacy group said two children were left inside a truck after the father was detained; in Chicago a detained child-care worker’s arrest left parents and kids distressed and spurred local uproar [4] [1]. Human Rights Watch and others characterize tactics used in some cities as aggressive and claim these operations have “ripped families apart,” suggesting enforcement practice can produce family separations even where policy discourages taking custody of minors [5].
4. Legal and judicial responses: courts pushing back in some places
Federal judges have intervened in some enforcement campaigns: a federal judge ordered the release of hundreds arrested in Illinois enforcement actions, noting many detainees lacked final removal orders and were not subject to mandatory detention — a ruling that affects who remains in custody and therefore who could be separated from children [3]. Reporting also shows DHS and ICE statements disputing particular claims about raids [9], illustrating that legal fights and factual disagreements over specific incidents are ongoing.
5. Systemic problems: coordination, data, and welfare checks
Reporting highlights systemic gaps — limited coordination between agencies, difficulties for child welfare systems to locate detained parents, and the need for welfare checks for children after raids. CNN and other outlets report that DHS has been conducting welfare checks and using interagency data in operations, and advocacy groups point to historical coordination failures that can lengthen separations [10] [8]. The Marshall Project and others stress the value of granular detention data to understand how enforcement affects families [11].
6. Competing narratives and political context
DHS and ICE at times push back on specific reports — for instance, denying targeted raids on day cares in particular incidents — while advocacy groups, journalists, and human-rights organizations characterize the enforcement campaign as aggressive and traumatizing for children and communities [9] [1] [5]. Policy changes under the current administration and large increases in detention funding are cited by critics as drivers of expanded, more disruptive enforcement [5] [12].
7. What this means for the original question — are minor boys detained with their fathers during ICE raids?
Available sources do not present systematic evidence that ICE routinely detains minor children alongside detained parents; ICE policy forbids transporting minors unless the minor is the subject of the enforcement action and requires efforts to arrange alternative care or to remain until child-welfare authorities arrive [2] [8]. However, reporting documents multiple real-world incidents where children were left at the scene, watched detentions unfold, or were otherwise affected by a parent’s arrest — including at least one instance of children left inside a vehicle after a father’s detention [4] [1]. That means while policy aims to prevent agents from "detaining" minors with parents, real-world separations and custody gaps have occurred.
Limitations and unanswered questions: available sources do not provide comprehensive, nationwide statistics on how often minors are physically transported or held with detained parents during raids, nor do they offer a systematic breakdown by age or gender (not found in current reporting). For case-level decisions, local law enforcement, child welfare agencies, and which DHS component (ICE versus CBP, for example) is present can change outcomes [2] [10].