Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: NAZIS 1940-1945 NUMBER OF CHILDREN KILLED PER DAY IN AUSCHWITZ CAMP 127 ISRAEL OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2023 NUMBER OF CHILDREN KILLED PER DAY IN GAZA 178 true or false

Checked on October 6, 2025

Executive Summary

The claim that Auschwitz killed 127 children per day in 1940–1945 and that Gaza saw 178 children killed per day in October/November 2023 is unsupported by the sources provided; the supplied materials do not provide the specific daily child-death figures necessary to verify either number. Contemporary reporting cited here documents high overall child suffering and large cumulative tolls in Gaza and summarizes Nazi-era atrocities, but none of the supplied analyses give verifiable per-day child-death rates for Auschwitz or Gaza that would substantiate the side-by-side comparison [1] [2] [3].

1. What the original claim actually asserts—and why it matters for comparison

The original statement presents a direct numeric juxtaposition: 127 children per day killed at Auschwitz (1940–1945) versus 178 children per day killed in Gaza (Oct–Nov 2023). That framing treats the two as quantitatively and morally comparable metrics, implying equivalence of scale and intent. The analytic materials supplied do not corroborate either daily-rate number; instead they offer broader casualty totals, famine and malnutrition reports, and historical summaries that lack the detailed time-series child-death counts required to compute daily averages for those precise intervals [1] [4] [2].

2. What the Gaza sources actually provide—and the limits of those data

Recent Gaza-focused analyses describe catastrophic civilian tolls, rising malnutrition and overall death counts, but do not report a specific “children per day” figure for Oct–Nov 2023. One source records a cumulative death toll of 66,005 and 168,162 wounded since a war began, and notes malnutrition affecting around 19% of children, but it does not break those totals into a verified daily child-death rate [1] [4]. Other humanitarian reporting characterizes starvation, blocked aid, and child endangerment, yet none of the supplied items present the explicit daily statistic of 178 child deaths that would be required to validate the claim [3] [5] [6].

3. What the Holocaust/Nazi sources actually provide—and historical nuance

The supplied Holocaust-era analyses summarize the massive scale of Nazi extermination and the existence of tens of thousands of ghettos and camps, but they do not supply a documented daily child-death rate of 127 per day at Auschwitz. Scholarly and journalistic treatments in this collection reaffirm the large-scale killing of Jews and other victims — including children — under Nazi policy, yet these items stop short of the precise per-day child mortality statistic the original claim presents [2] [7]. Comparing a wartime contemporary toll to Holocaust-era figures requires careful archival sourcing, which is absent here.

4. Why per-day figures are fragile: methodology and time-window issues

Daily death-rate calculations depend on clear numerator and denominator choices — precise counts of child deaths and an agreed time period — neither of which are provided in these analyses. The Gaza references give cumulative totals and descriptions of acute malnutrition and collapsing services; they do not list reliable, independently verified child-only death counts for Oct–Nov 2023. The Holocaust summaries similarly lack day-by-day child counts. Without transparent methodologies and contemporaneous records, per-day rates are not verifiable from the provided material [1] [4] [2].

5. Alternative viewpoints and potential agendas in the available material

The supplied Gaza pieces stress humanitarian catastrophe, malnutrition, and blocked aid — framing that foregrounds civilian suffering and may reflect advocacy or humanitarian reporting priorities [4] [3]. The Holocaust items understandably emphasize systematic killing and historical atrocity, which can be invoked in rhetorical comparisons. The absence of direct daily-rate data across these sources raises the possibility that the original numeric juxtaposition is rhetorical or propagandistic rather than empirically derived; the provided analyses neither confirm nor reproduce those per-day figures [2] [6].

6. What would be needed to verify the original numbers credibly

Verification requires primary or secondary sources that explicitly list child deaths by date and that have undergone independent verification: archival Nazi camp records or reputable Holocaust demographic studies for Auschwitz, and contemporaneous, independently-audited casualty tallies disaggregated by age for Gaza during Oct–Nov 2023. The current set of analyses lacks such precise, dated datasets and therefore cannot substantiate the 127/day or 178/day claims [2] [1].

7. Bottom line: true, false, or unproven — and how to proceed

Based on the supplied sources, the claim is unproven. The materials document severe child suffering and high overall casualties in Gaza and confirm the massive scale of Nazi child killings historically, but they do not provide the explicit, verifiable per-day child-death figures needed to declare the numerical comparison true or false. To settle the claim, seek peer-reviewed Holocaust demographic research and independently verified, age-disaggregated casualty tallies for the Gaza dates in question.

Want to dive deeper?
What was the total number of children killed in Auschwitz between 1940 and 1945?
How does the 2023 Gaza conflict compare to historical humanitarian crises in terms of child casualties?
What are the main differences between the Nazi regime's atrocities and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
What international organizations are working to reduce child casualties in conflict zones like Gaza?
How do the daily child death rates in Auschwitz and Gaza reflect on the effectiveness of international humanitarian law?