Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Is it illegal in Australia to connect two random people in a phone call using software, so they spend ages figuring out who called who when in reality, no one called anyone?

Checked on April 19, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Connecting random people through software-manipulated phone calls in Australia is likely illegal under several circumstances. The Telecommunications Act of 1997 explicitly prohibits using telecommunications services for harassment or causing offense [1]. Such activities could be classified as CLI (Calling Line Identification) spoofing, which is illegal when used for malicious purposes [2]. The practice could result in serious legal consequences, especially if it involves repeated unwanted contact or causes distress to recipients [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question overlooks several important legal and regulatory aspects:

  • Regulatory Framework: The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) actively works to prevent phone scams and misuse of telecommunications technology [4]
  • Recording Implications: If any recording is involved, there are strict consent laws that vary by state:
  • Queensland allows one-party consent
  • New South Wales and Victoria require all-party consent [5]
  • Violations can result in fines and criminal charges [6]
  • Telecommunications Infrastructure: Australian telcos have implemented systems specifically designed to block scam calls and prevent number spoofing [2]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question oversimplifies the legal implications by framing it as a harmless prank. It fails to acknowledge that:

  • Such actions could be classified as harassment or stalking under Australian law [3]
  • The practice falls under CLI spoofing regulations when used maliciously [2]
  • There are varying degrees of legal severity depending on:
  • The frequency of calls
  • The level of distress caused
  • Whether emergency services are involved [3]
  • The question ignores the existence of active regulatory frameworks and law enforcement collaboration aimed at preventing such activities [4]
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?