Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Are there authenticated security camera or traffic camera videos capturing Flight 77 near the Pentagon prior to impact?

Checked on November 25, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Publicly released Pentagon security and nearby traffic-camera footage does contain frames that show American Airlines Flight 77 immediately before and at the moment it struck the building, but the clips are low-resolution, captured at very slow frame rates and were originally recorded by license-plate/parking gate cameras not optimized for fast-moving aircraft (see releases from the Defense Department and reporting on the Judicial Watch FOIA case) [1][2][3].

1. What the officially released videos actually show

The Department of Defense released security-camera footage in 2006 that the Pentagon described as recording Flight 77 striking the building; news reports say the plane appears as a “thin white blur” in the frames immediately before a fireball at impact [1][4]. Associated Press, AFP and other outlets note that the released Pentagon security cameras captured the crash, and the FBI and DoD archives include related surveillance clips and still frames [5][6][7].

2. Why the footage looks so unconvincing to some viewers

The cameras that recorded the images were designed to capture license plates and vehicular traffic, not fast airborne objects; they operated at a very slow effective frame rate (reported as roughly 1 frame per second), so the plane’s approach is visible only as a brief, thin blur in one or a couple of frames rather than a clear continuous video of a jet flying into the building [2][3]. Popular Mechanics and other analyses emphasize that slow frame rates and camera positioning account for much of the ambiguity that fuels alternative interpretations [3].

3. How many cameras and why some recordings don’t show the plane

According to reporting on FBI material and secondary research, the FBI listed many surveillance recordings in the area — the figure often cited is about 80 cameras — but most either didn’t capture the crash site or only recorded events after impact; only a small number contained frames showing the aircraft or immediate aftermath [8]. Some nearby hotel or traffic cameras were pointed away and then reoriented later, producing footage that shows smoke after the crash but not the approach [9][8].

4. Documentary releases and where researchers obtained the clips

Judicial Watch obtained the Pentagon tapes via a FOIA suit, prompting the DoD to post footage in May 2006; media outlets (CBS, AP) covered the release and described the plane as visible in the released security-camera frames [1][5]. The FBI also posts related videos and images in its public “Vault” collection, and copies of the released clips circulate in public archives like Wikimedia Commons and DVIDS [6][10][11].

5. How fact-checkers and mainstream outlets have responded to conspiracy claims

Fact-checkers at AFP and reporting at AP and other outlets have repeatedly debunked claims that no video exists or that a missile struck the Pentagon by pointing to the released security footage that shows Flight 77 at impact and to eyewitness accounts corroborating the crash [4][5]. Those outlets stress that while footage is grainy, frame-by-frame review demonstrates an object consistent with a Boeing 757 hitting the building at the recorded time [4][5].

6. What remains contested or unclear in public records

Available sources document the released footage and describe its limitations, but they also report that many recordings were either not useful or did not capture the approach, which has fueled skepticism among some commentators [8][2]. Investigative enthusiasts cite additional traffic or VDOT cameras they say observed the crash area; material posted by independent researchers and blogs claims other CCTV frames exist, but those secondary claims are unevenly sourced and not uniformly corroborated in the mainstream reporting cited here [12][8].

7. Takeaway for a reader trying to assess authenticity

If your question is whether authenticated security- or traffic-camera videos exist that show Flight 77 near the Pentagon prior to impact, the answer in official records is yes: DoD/FBI-released Pentagon security-camera frames show the plane as a brief white blur immediately before impact, and nearby traffic/hotel cameras provide post-impact smoke imagery; however, the footage’s poor resolution and slow frame rate limit how visually definitive it appears to viewers [1][2][3]. Fact-checking organizations and mainstream news outlets cite those same released files to rebut claims of a non-plane impact [4][5].

Limitations: this analysis is drawn only from the cited reporting and archival descriptions; available sources do not mention any other high-resolution continuous video of Flight 77’s final approach beyond the released Pentagon security and nearby CCTV frames referenced above [10][9].

Want to dive deeper?
Are any verified surveillance or traffic camera recordings showing American Airlines Flight 77 approaching the Pentagon before it hit?
Which government or independent archives hold original Pentagon-area traffic or security footage from September 11, 2001?
Have forensic analyses authenticated or disputed video evidence of Flight 77’s final approach and impact?
What legal or classification barriers prevent public release of Pentagon surveillance footage from 9/11?
How do Pentagon security camera placements and capabilities in 2001 compare to the video evidence released publicly?