Has Dr. Ben Carson's name been used without permission in supplement marketing schemes?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Multiple reputable fact‑checks and media analyses document repeated use of Dr. Ben Carson’s name and likeness in online supplement marketing scams; outlets from AFP, Reuters, PolitiFact, Science Feedback and others show fake headlines, doctored pages, altered audio/video and false endorsements tied to CBD gummies, “blood‑vessel cleaning” products, Alzheimer’s sprays and erectile or prostate remedies (e.g., AFP, Reuters, PolitiFact, Science Feedback) [1] [2] [3] [4]. Carson’s spokespeople and fact‑checkers consistently state he did not endorse these products and that the ads are scams [1] [5] [3].
1. A pattern of fake endorsements and fabricated headlines
Since at least 2023, social posts and ad screenshots have circulated claiming Dr. Ben Carson discovered “natural cures,” won prizes, or endorsed supplements; fact‑checking outlets found the headlines and site mock‑ups were fabricated and often redirected to product funnels selling CBD gummies, sprays or “gummies to clean blood vessels” [1] [4] [6]. AFP and Reuters documented instances where the imagery and styled pages mimic major outlets (Time, CNN, USA TODAY) but lead only to commercial pages, a common sign of deceptive ad funnels [1] [2] [7].
2. Multiple product categories targeted with his image or name
The scams are not a one‑off: they include hypertension and CBD gummies, erectile‑dysfunction or prostate remedies, Alzheimer’s or dementia “cures,” and other memory‑boosting supplements — all tied to phony Carson endorsements across platforms [4] [5] [7]. Science Feedback reviewed CBD/hypertension campaigns showing repeated use of “fake outlets, fake endorsements, and unsubstantiated appeal to authority,” concluding the marketing strongly indicates a scam [4].
3. Technical deception: doctored pages, altered audio/video, and deepfakes
Fact‑checkers found edited screenshots, spoofed news sites, and in some cases altered audio in clips used to imply Carson’s endorsement; Lead Stories and university media‑forensics labs have flagged such items, and fact checks note that clicking apparent links typically redirects to sales pages rather than legitimate reporting [8] [5] [6]. AFP and Reuters quote Carson’s representatives denying any role and calling the posts scams, underscoring that the artifacts were manufactured for marketing [1] [2].
4. Public response and official warnings
Carson’s nonprofit and spokespersons have repeatedly told journalists the endorsements are false; AFP and PolitiFact reported direct denials from his camp [1] [3]. Regulators and fact‑check sources cited in reporting — including the FTC and FDA warnings about health‑fraud scams on social media — frame these schemes as part of a broader ecosystem of deceptive health advertising [1] [5].
5. Where reporting disagrees or leaves gaps
Available sources uniformly document examples of misuse and denials; they do not present credible evidence that Carson authorized these endorsements. Sources also vary in focus — Science Feedback emphasizes scam‑characteristics of the CBD/hypertension funnels, while AFP and Reuters catalogue multiple product types — but none show a legitimate sponsorship or paid partnership by Carson [4] [1] [2]. Available sources do not mention legal actions taken by Carson against specific advertisers, beyond public denials (not found in current reporting).
6. How the scams work and why they persist
Reports identify familiar playbook elements: fake headlines styled like major outlets, countdown or “limited supply” sales pressure, testimonials and redirected links to purchase pages — tactics that prioritize conversions over evidence and exploit trust in named authorities like Carson [9] [4]. Science Feedback and other analysts say the mix of simulated credibility and aggressive retargeting makes these funnels effective at extracting purchases despite lacking clinical proof [4] [9].
7. Takeaway for readers and platforms
Independent fact checks (AFP, Reuters, PolitiFact, Science Feedback) offer a clear verdict across multiple campaigns: Ben Carson’s name and image have been used without permission in supplement marketing schemes and the specific product claims are false or unsupported [1] [2] [4]. Consumers should treat sponsored claims tied to doctored headlines or celebrity images with extreme skepticism and consult regulators’ advisories on health‑fraud scams before buying [1] [5].
Limitations: this account relies only on the provided reporting and fact‑checks; those sources document repeated misuse but do not catalog every fraudulent item nor report on any private legal settlements that may exist (available sources do not mention legal settlements) [1] [4] [2].