Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How does Bill C-2 affect criminal justice reforms in Canada?
Executive summary
Bill C-2 is omnibus “Strong Borders” legislation that, if enacted, would expand law‑enforcement and national‑security powers (including new definitions and access to “subscriber information,” expanded authority to obtain transmission and tracking data, and tools aimed at disrupting fentanyl and organized crime) and introduce criminal‑law changes affecting vulnerable‑person protections and evidence procedures [1] [2] [3]. The government says these measures will toughen border/security and help prosecutors, while legal analysts and privacy experts warn the bill broadens data‑sharing and surveillance powers with important Charter and privacy trade‑offs [4] [5] [2].
1. What the bill actually changes: a fast tour of the new powers
Bill C-2 combines many measures: it proposes a new statutory definition of “subscriber information” in the Criminal Code and expands authorities for courts or judges to authorize peace officers or public officers to obtain transmission data, tracking data, and to request foreign telecom entities to produce data [2] [1]. It would create mechanisms (the Supporting Authorized Access to Information Act) to ensure electronic service providers can facilitate lawful access to information, and it amends mutual‑legal‑assistance rules to allow enforcement arrangements with foreign authorities about production of such data [1]. The bill also touches on Canada Post mail searches and detention orders for seized mail and contains provisions aimed at stopping fentanyl and other contraband in the mail [3] [6].
2. Criminal‑justice and sentencing implications: what’s in and what’s out of scope
While Bill C-2 strengthens investigative tools and data access for law enforcement, it is not primarily a sweeping bail or sentencing reform package; other government proposals address bail and sentencing separately (for example, the Bail and Sentencing Reform Act introduced in October 2025) [7] [8]. Bill C-2’s criminal‑law amendments notably include offences and procedural reforms relating to protection of children and vulnerable witnesses and amendments intended to facilitate testimony by young or vulnerable persons in court [9]. It also contains measures giving law enforcement tailored investigatory powers to pursue organized and drug‑trafficking networks [1] [4].
3. Privacy and Charter considerations: experts flag data‑sharing risks
Independent analysts—including Citizen Lab and privacy commissioners during consultations—have pointed to significant privacy implications and warned that Bill C-2’s new data access architecture could make Canada better positioned to ratify international data‑sharing instruments (like the Second Additional Protocol to the Budapest Convention or arrangements akin to the U.S. CLOUD Act), with attendant privacy and oversight gaps if safeguards are not strengthened [5]. Justice Canada’s Charter Statement acknowledges that parts of the bill expand law‑enforcement access to information and sets out proposed safeguards, but critics say those safeguards may be insufficient given the breadth of the proposed new definitions and production powers [3] [5].
4. How proponents frame the bill: security, fentanyl, and organized crime
The government frames Bill C-2 as a targeted response to “increasingly complex criminal groups,” transnational organized crime, money‑laundering risks, and the trafficking of fentanyl—promising tools to intercept contraband in the mail, more timely access to subscriber or transmission data, and tougher enforcement options for the Canada Border Services Agency and police [4] [6]. Officials and supporters argue the measures modernize investigative law to keep pace with technology and cross‑border criminal networks [4] [10].
5. Opposition and legal community concerns: Charter, oversight, and proportionality
Opponents and many legal observers have raised concerns that Bill C-2 concentrates surveillance and production powers without commensurate transparency, independent oversight, or clear limits—raising Charter section 8 (unreasonable search) and privacy questions [5] [2]. Law societies and some commentators have urged Parliament to consider alternate approaches and stronger safeguards before granting broad new authorities [11] [5].
6. Practical impact on criminal‑justice reform debates in Canada
Bill C-2 will likely shift the focus of criminal‑justice debates from sentencing and bail (which the government is addressing in separate legislation) to investigative reach and information‑sharing: it centralizes a conversation about surveillance, cross‑border cooperation, and evidence‑gathering in the digital age [7] [1]. That means criminal‑justice reform in Canada will be contested on two fronts: traditional sentencing/bail policy and newer questions about data access, privacy, and international cooperation—each with different stakeholders and constitutional considerations [7] [5].
7. Bottom line for policymakers and the public
Bill C-2 is not a narrow, technical bill: it combines expanded investigatory tools, amendments affecting vulnerable‑person protections, and mechanisms to facilitate international data production—measures the government says are needed to fight organized crime and fentanyl trafficking, and which privacy experts worry may outpace safeguards [4] [5] [2]. Parliament will need to weigh promised security benefits against the documented privacy and Charter trade‑offs and consider whether additional oversight, reporting, or limits are required—an argument already visible in public‑service briefings and legal commentary [1] [5].