Australia bondi beach shooting: I've seen a video of a Man stopping one of the perpetrators, is it right? it corresponds with this event?

Checked on December 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Video footage circulating online shows a bystander tackling and disarming one of the shooters during the December 14, 2025 Bondi Beach attack; multiple major outlets verified the clip and identified the intervenor in reporting as Ahmed al Ahmed (identified by local media) while officials praised his actions [1] [2] [3]. Authorities treat the Bondi event as a terrorist attack in which a father-and-son duo killed at least 15 people and injured dozens at a Hanukkah celebration near Bondi Pavilion [4] [5].

1. What the video shows and how reporters verified it

Multiple news organisations say the same clip shows an unarmed bystander run up behind one gunman, wrestle a long gun away, and then hold it on the suspect as the attacker staggers away; Reuters and The New York Times explicitly state they verified the footage against other visuals from the scene to confirm it depicts the Bondi attack [2] [1]. Outlets including Al Jazeera, NPR, Washington Post and ABC published versions of the same video and described the sequence in similar detail, indicating broad corroboration across independent newsrooms [3] [6] [7] [8].

2. Who intervened — what reporting says about his identity

Local media and several international outlets named the bystander as 43-year-old Ahmed al Ahmed; Australian officials initially praised the unnamed intervenor and later public figures, including the prime minister, referred to him by name in reiterations of media reporting [3] [9] [10]. Reuters reported police could not immediately confirm the identity at the time of its piece, while other outlets repeated the local identification via 7NEWS and family interviews [2] [11] [10]. Available sources do not mention independent official confirmation beyond police acknowledgement of the act [2] [11].

3. What authorities and leaders said about the act

New South Wales and national leaders publicly hailed the person who disarmed the shooter as heroic; NSW Premier Chris Minns called the footage “the most unbelievable scene” and New South Wales Police praised the bravery of officers and members of the public [2] [12]. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese explicitly noted the bystander “took the gun off that perpetrator at great risk to himself” and reported the man was hospitalised and undergoing surgery [3] [9].

4. The broader incident: motive, casualties and status

Police and national security agencies have declared the Bondi attack a terrorism event targeting Jewish Australians at a Hanukkah celebration; reporting places the death toll at least 15 and dozens hospitalized, describing the perpetrators as a father-and-son duo [4] [5]. Media reports also note explosive devices were found and removed at the scene, and one suspect remains critically injured and expected to face charges when able [13] [4].

5. Competing details and unresolved points

News outlets differ slightly on casualty counts (some report 15, others 16) and on whether identities were formally confirmed by police versus local media — Reuters and AP emphasise verification caution, while local outlets and family interviews assert the bystander’s name [4] [14] [2] [11]. Police initially said they could not immediately confirm the bystander’s identity even as 7NEWS and other domestic outlets named him [2] [11]. Available sources do not mention independent forensic confirmation linking the video to every moment of the wider attack beyond visual corroboration [2].

6. Why this context matters and potential misinformation risks

Because the clip is vivid and widely shared, it can become a focal point for competing narratives — some outlets foreground heroism to offer hope while others stress verification limits; Reuters’ note that it confirmed the video against other footage shows responsible verification practice, but naming bystanders before police confirmation risks error if later contradicted [2] [10]. Political figures and international commentators have used the episode to advance wider arguments about antisemitism, national security and immigration; those broader policy claims are in reporting but not adjudicated by the footage itself [15] [16].

7. Bottom line for readers seeking truth about the clip

The video does correspond to the Bondi Beach attack as verified by multiple major newsrooms and shows a bystander disarming a shooter; local media and family sources identify him as Ahmed al Ahmed while police acknowledged the intervention but were initially cautious about confirming identity [1] [2] [11]. For unresolved or evolving questions — exact casualty totals, final police confirmations and full legal proceedings against suspects — rely on official police briefings and follow-up reporting cited above [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
Did a bystander intervene during the Bondi Beach shooting and is that footage verified?
What is the confirmed timeline and number of perpetrators in the Bondi Beach shooting?
Which official sources or police statements confirm actions taken by civilians at the scene?
Has any independent fact-checking organization verified the viral video from Bondi Beach?
What legal and safety risks do civilians face when confronting active shooters in Australia?