Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Brian Kilmeade involuntary lethal injections

Checked on September 13, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement claims that Brian Kilmeade suggested involuntary lethal injections [1]. According to multiple sources, including [1], [7], [1], and [7], Brian Kilmeade did indeed suggest "just kill them" or "involuntary lethal injection" as a solution for homeless people with mental health issues, with some sources quoting him directly [1]. Additionally, source [7] confirms that his co-hosts seemed to agree with his suggestion, while source [2] provides a transcript of the conversation where Brian Kilmeade makes the suggestion, with co-host Lawrence Jones responding with "Yeah" [2]. However, it is essential to note that other sources, such as [3], [4], and [5], do not mention Brian Kilmeade or involuntary lethal injections, instead discussing the history and controversies surrounding lethal injection as a method of execution in the United States [3], a 2015 US Supreme Court decision on lethal injection [4], and the effects of lethal injection on inmates [5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A crucial aspect missing from the original statement is the context in which Brian Kilmeade made his suggestion, as well as the potential consequences of such a policy [6]. Source [6] criticizes Brian Kilmeade's comments as "bloodthirsty" and part of a larger focus on homelessness from the right, highlighting the backlash against his suggestion [6]. Furthermore, sources [3], [4], and [5] provide alternative viewpoints on the topic of lethal injection, discussing its history, controversies, and effects on inmates, which could be relevant to the discussion of Brian Kilmeade's suggestion [3] [4] [5]. It is also important to consider the ethical implications of involuntary lethal injection, as well as the potential impact on vulnerable populations, such as homeless people with mental health issues [1].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading or sensationalized, as it does not provide context or acknowledge the complexity of the issue [1]. Sources [1], [7], and [1] may be biased towards criticizing Brian Kilmeade's comments, while sources [3], [4], and [5] may be neutral or informative in their discussion of lethal injection [3]. Additionally, the original statement may benefit certain groups, such as those who oppose Brian Kilmeade or Fox News, by portraying them in a negative light [6]. On the other hand, the statement may harm vulnerable populations, such as homeless people with mental health issues, by perpetuating negative stereotypes or stigma [1]. Ultimately, it is essential to approach this topic with nuance and critical thinking, considering multiple sources and perspectives to form a well-rounded understanding of the issue [1] [7] [6] [3] [4] [5] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What is Brian Kilmeade's stance on capital punishment?
How many states still practice involuntary lethal injections in 2025?
What are the ethical concerns surrounding involuntary lethal injections?
Has Brian Kilmeade discussed involuntary lethal injections on his show before?
What are the current laws regarding involuntary lethal injections in the United States as of 2025?