What medical records or court documents have been released about Brittney Griner's sex assigned at birth?

Checked on December 6, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Available reporting in the provided search results contains no verified medical records or court documents that state Brittney Griner’s sex assigned at birth; rather, contemporary coverage focuses on her being publicly known and identified as a woman and on court filings about medical cannabis during her 2022 Russian detention (medical records cited in court filings) [1] [2] [3]. Numerous online pieces and fact-checkers describe widespread rumors and fabricated “leaks” about her birth assignment or surgeries; reputable outlets in the set explicitly note the absence of verified medical-document leaks [4] [5] [1].

1. What the court record released in Russia actually included: medical notes about cannabis, not birth-assignment data

During Griner’s 2022 Russian proceedings, her lawyers submitted written evidence that included a doctor’s letter recommending medical cannabis and other medical documents related to pain treatment; those court filings were widely reported by U.S. outlets such as CNN and PBS, but the reporting centers on the cannabis prescription and chronic-pain treatment—nothing in these reports is described as confirming or revealing her sex assigned at birth [1] [2] [3].

2. Reuters and other fact-checks exposed fabricated claims about DNA tests and “sex verification”

Independent fact-checking in the archive found fabricated screenshots and viral posts claiming Russian officials ordered DNA tests or otherwise sought to “prove” Griner’s sex; Reuters documented a fabricated CNN screenshot circulating in 2022 and debunked claims that Russian authorities ordered DNA testing or released authoritative documents on her birth sex [4]. That debunking underscores that some widely shared claims are inventions rather than verifiable court disclosures [4].

3. Media narratives vs. fringe rumor mills: a contested information environment

The search set includes mainstream reporting (court filings about the cannabis prescription) and many later webpages, blogs, and social posts recycling or inventing claims that Griner was assigned male at birth, had secret surgeries, or that “leaked medical records” exist [6] [5] [7]. Several of those pieces are explicitly labeled as misinformation by fact-checks or cautionary articles in the set; one source notes there is no verified evidence that hospital or medical authorities confirmed the alleged leaked documents [5] [8].

4. Sources in the set that assert she was assigned female at birth are primarily secondary or unverified summaries

Multiple items in the provided results state Griner was assigned female at birth or is a cisgender woman [9] [10] [11]. These pages often present the claim as corrective to online rumors, but they are not citations of primary legal or medical documents in the reporting set; they appear to be secondary summaries or opinionated debunks rather than published, original vital records disclosed in court [9] [10] [11]. Available sources do not mention release of an official birth certificate or court order in the set that explicitly states her birth assignment.

5. What reputable news reporting in this set confirms and what it does not

Reputable outlets in the provided results confirm that Griner’s defense produced medical documents to explain possession of prescribed cannabis during the Russia trial [1] [3]. They also report that social media posts have spread false claims and fabricated images about DNA tests or sex verification [4] [5]. These same reputable items do not report any court judgment or public medical-record release that states her sex assigned at birth [1] [4] [3].

6. Competing viewpoints and motivations in the documents cited

Within the set, some websites and blogs affirmatively state she was assigned female at birth and label rumors as misinformation [9] [10]. Other fringe sites advance the opposite claim or assert leaked records exist without verifiable sourcing [6] [12]. The mixed landscape suggests both corrective motives (debunking conspiracies) and bad-faith motives (sensationalizing or weaponizing gender claims) across actors in the record [9] [6] [5].

7. Bottom line and reporting limits

Based on the documents and articles supplied here, there are no publicly released medical records or court documents in this set that establish Brittney Griner’s sex assigned at birth; the concrete court materials reported relate to medical cannabis prescriptions and related records used in her Russian defense [1] [2] [3]. Claims purporting to show “leaked” medical records or DNA tests have been challenged and, in at least one instance, debunked as fabricated in the provided materials [4] [5]. Available sources do not mention release of a birth certificate or comparable primary document specifying her sex assignment.

Want to dive deeper?
What medical records have been publicly released about brittney griner's sex assigned at birth?
Have any court filings or affidavits mentioned brittney griner's sex assigned at birth?
Which news organizations obtained and published documents about brittney griner's medical or legal records?
What are the legal limits on releasing an athlete's medical or birth records in the united states?
How have activists and legal experts interpreted released documents regarding brittney griner's sex assigned at birth?