Have prosecutions or charges resulted from alleged noncitizen voting in California?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Prosecutions tied to alleged noncitizen voting in California have been rare; reporting and studies show only isolated incidents and few referrals for prosecution, and recent federal actions focus on records requests and lawsuits rather than charging voters. For example, state officials treated 2018 California motor-voter enrollment errors as inadvertent and did not pursue prosecutions [1] [2]; the Department of Justice sued Orange County in June 2025 over refusal to provide records but did not allege noncitizen voting there — only registrations [3] [4].
1. Historic incidents were investigated but usually not prosecuted
Longstanding reporting and studies indicate election officials have flagged potential noncitizen registrations yet rarely moved to criminal charges. A Brennan Center-based review found only about 30 suspected instances referred for further investigation across large jurisdictions in 2016, and the California secretary of state decided not to prosecute cases from a two-decade-old federal inquiry after concluding many registrations were errors rather than intentional illegal voting [1] [5].
2. The 2018 “motor-voter” error in California — mistakes, not mass prosecutions
California’s automatic registration rollout in 2018 produced at least 1,500 ineligible enrollments, including some noncitizens; state officials characterized the problem as a processing error and did not bring widespread prosecutions, noting only about six people were found to have voted in that cycle from among the erroneously registered [2] [1].
3. Federal prosecutions have occurred elsewhere but are uncommon in California
Federal enforcement has produced cases nationally — for example, a 2020 North Carolina prosecution of multiple noncitizens — but reporting and databases show few prosecutions overall and do not identify a parallel wave of California criminal cases tied to noncitizen voting [6] [5]. The Heritage Foundation database counts dozens of cases statewide over decades (Poynter cites 69 cases in California from 1982–2025), but news outlets and researchers emphasize these are scattered, rare instances rather than systemic fraud [7].
4. Recent DOJ actions in California focus on records and compliance, not charging ballots
In 2025 the Justice Department sued the Orange County registrar for refusing to provide records about removed noncitizens, asserting federal law requires access to voter-roll data; that complaint sought information and compliance under federal elections law, and the DOJ’s public statement centers on recordkeeping and removals rather than alleging specific illegal votes in that county [3] [4].
5. San Francisco and municipal noncitizen voting are legally distinct and limited
Some California localities have narrow, lawful programs allowing certain noncitizens to vote in specific local contests (not federal elections). San Francisco permits noncitizen parents and guardians to vote in school board elections; courts have upheld that program in California litigation, and election authorities note participation in such local programs is separate from federal eligibility and naturalization questions [8] [9].
6. Scholarly and bipartisan analyses: prosecutions exist but are rare and rarely decisive
Policy researchers and bipartisan groups conclude illegal noncitizen voting is investigated and sometimes prosecuted, but instances are so uncommon they have not been shown to change election outcomes. The Bipartisan Policy Center and Cato summaries cite small absolute numbers (tens of cases) over many millions of votes, and they stress routine safeguards and the infrequency of prosecutions [10] [5].
7. What reporting does not say — limits of available sources
Available sources do not identify any recent, large-scale prosecutions in California that resulted from the DOJ’s 2025 records requests; PBS and other reporting note the DOJ’s Orange County suit did not allege that noncitizens actually voted there, only that registrations occurred and records were withheld [4]. Available sources do not mention a statewide criminal sweep in California tied to alleged noncitizen voting following the DOJ inquiries [3] [4].
8. Competing frames: enforcement, accuracy, and politics
Government statements frame prosecutions and record demands as necessary to enforce federal criminal law and preserve accurate rolls [3]. Civil-society and fact-checking outlets emphasize errors, limited scope, and the rarity of prosecutions, warning that broad claims about mass illegal voting are not supported by the documented caseload [1] [7]. Political context matters: federal requests for voter-roll data in 2025 drew criticism from some state and local officials who worried about misuse of sensitive information [6] [11].
Bottom line: investigations and a small number of prosecutions related to noncitizen voting exist nationally, but available reporting from California shows isolated registration errors treated administratively and recent DOJ action in Orange County focused on obtaining records rather than charging voters; broader claims of widespread prosecutions in California are not supported by the cited sources [1] [3] [4] [2].