What age limits and exceptions (pregnancy, emancipation) apply to underage marriage in California 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
California’s baseline legal marrying age is 18, but state law allows persons under 18 to marry if they obtain parental consent and a court order—meaning there is effectively no statutory minimum age when those exceptions are applied [1] [2]. Courts, advocates, and reformers continue to clash over those exceptions: supporters of change want a flat 18-year floor, while opponents and some interest groups have resisted such a ban [3] [4].
1. How the law is written now: 18 is the default, but exceptions swallow the floor
California Family Code establishes 18 as the general legal age to marry, yet it also permits a person under 18 to be issued a marriage license only after obtaining a court order granting permission and, in practice, written parental consent—so statutory language creates an exception pathway rather than a minimum “floor” age [1] [5]. Multiple legal guides and county court pages summarize that minors must secure at least one parent or guardian’s consent and judicial authorization before a marriage license can be issued [6] [7].
2. The no‑minimum‑age reality and how it plays out in practice
Because parental consent combined with judicial approval can, under current law, allow virtually any underage person to marry, California is counted among states that effectively set no minimum marriage age when all exemptions are considered [2] [8]. National compilations and advocacy groups repeatedly note that California’s statutory scheme has produced a “no minimum” outcome, a fact activists cite when pressing for a statutory ban on marriage under 18 with no exceptions [9] [10].
3. Pregnancy and other “exceptional circumstances” — what they change
State guidance and legal summaries say courts evaluate “exceptional circumstances” in underage marriage petitions; pregnancy or the existence of a child is commonly treated as a factor that can justify expedited or favorable rulings by judges, and some county practices allow pregnant minors to bypass waiting periods or receive quicker permission [11] [5]. Advocacy organizations and media accounts have highlighted that pregnancy has historically been one of the most common justifications used to obtain judicial permission for a minor to marry, a reality that fuels criticism that marriage can be used to shield statutory-sex offenses from prosecution [4] [10].
4. Emancipation, annulment, and legal consequences tied to underage marriage
Across state reporting, marriage by a minor often interacts with other legal doctrines: in many jurisdictions a minor’s marriage can produce legal emancipation or increased adult-type rights, and California law treats underage marriages as voidable (not automatically void), creating a limited window for annulment after reaching majority—resources note that annulment and voidability rules allow parties to seek relief, with timing and procedural limits [1] [11]. Sources indicate that emancipation status and prior graduation from high school can influence court handling of petitions, and some procedural rules (such as waiting periods) can be shortened for pregnant minors or graduates, although exact county practices vary [11] [6].
5. The political fight and reform efforts shaping 2025 debate
Reform advocates such as UNICEF USA, Unchained at Last, and local coalitions have campaigned to end all exceptions and set a bright‑line age of 18 nationwide; California legislators have repeatedly introduced bills to ban underage marriage without exceptions, reflecting a sustained push against the exception framework [4] [10]. Reporting from the Los Angeles Times and advocacy groups chronicles organized resistance from unexpected quarters and ongoing legislative efforts, underscoring that while the law in 2025 still allows judicial‑and‑parental exceptions, political pressure may yield statutory change [3] [9].