Can ICE agents carry personally owned firearms or only agency-issued weapons?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
ICE permits certain officers and agents to carry personally owned firearms (POFs) for official duty and off‑duty carry, but only from an agency‑approved list and after inspection, authorization, and regular qualification; agency policy also reserves the right to amend that list and imposes use‑of‑force constraints on when any weapon may be fired [1] [2] [3]. Public transparency around ICE’s detailed firearms and use‑of‑force rules is limited by redactions and internal directives, leaving gaps about some application details [4] [5].
1. What the rules say in plain language
ICE’s published and FOIA‑released materials make clear that authorized ICE law enforcement personnel may carry ICE‑issued firearms and, under controlled circumstances, “ICE‑approved personally owned firearms” that have been inspected and approved by the agency’s firearms unit; those weapons must meet ICE standards and the officer must qualify with the firearm on a set schedule [1] [2]. The agency’s policies explicitly state that the approved personally owned firearms list can be amended or rescinded at any time, underscoring that approval is conditional and revocable [3].
2. How authorization and oversight work
Authorization to carry a personally owned weapon is not automatic: ICE directives and the Firearms and Use of Force handbook require written or formal authorization, inspection of the weapon, and periodic qualification—often cited as quarterly—so the agency retains technical and operational oversight of what PO Fs can be carried on duty or while off duty [1] [2]. ICE also defines “authorized officer” status in its directives, linking the authority to carry to specific regulatory and supervisory approvals rather than to a blanket entitlement [1].
3. Limits, use‑of‑force context, and agency discretion
Approval to carry a personally owned firearm does not change or expand the legal limits on when ICE personnel may use deadly force: ICE and DHS guidance prohibit discharging firearms solely to disable vehicles and allow deadly force only when an agent reasonably believes there is an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm, mirroring DOJ and FBI standards [6] [7]. At the same time, advocates and reporters note that ICE’s core Firearms and Use of Force directive has been heavily redacted in public releases, prompting criticism that the public cannot fully evaluate when and how those approved weapons are deployed [4].
4. Practical implications and controversies
In practice, the combination of an approved‑list framework, routine qualification, and use‑of‑force limits means ICE agents can and do carry personally owned firearms when the agency authorizes them, but controversies about shootings and tactics have sharpened scrutiny of those rules and ICE’s transparency around them [2] [8]. Critics point to redactions and limited disclosure as evidence that internal rules—especially the full contours of when deadly force is permitted—are effectively concealed from public view, while ICE and DHS assert that operational control and safety require administrative oversight [4] [5].
5. What reporting does not resolve
Available documents establish the existence of an agency‑approved POF program and the agency’s right to control and revoke approvals, and they describe qualification and use‑of‑force limits, but the public record in the provided sources does not fully illuminate the frequency of approvals, the exact technical criteria for weapon approval, or how often approvals are revoked—gaps driven in part by redacted directives and limited FOIA releases [3] [4]. Where specifics are absent from the cited materials, no definitive claim about operational frequency or internal decision‑making can be made without additional unredacted documentation.