Are US citizens being denied entry back after travelling?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
US authorities have not broadly barred citizens from returning, but new December 2025 rules and policy shifts are sharply increasing returns being delayed or refused for non‑citizens and some lawful permanent residents: DHS will require mandatory facial‑recognition biometrics for all non‑U.S. citizens at entry/exit starting Dec. 26, 2025 and refusal can mean denied boarding or entry [1]. Separately, the administration has paused immigration adjudications (green cards, naturalizations, asylum) for nationals of 19 countries and is expanding a travel‑ban list to more than 30 nations, affecting who may enter or complete immigration benefits [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. What the public reports actually say: citizens vs. non‑citizens
Mainstream reporting and government memoranda focus on expanded bans and stricter screening for foreign nationals, not a wholesale bar on U.S. citizens returning home. Reuters, NYT and USCIS documents describe freezes on immigration benefits for nationals of 19 countries and new review processes for certain entries [3] [2] [5]. The biometric rule cited in sector reporting explicitly covers “non‑U.S. citizens” — refusal is linked to denied boarding/entry only for non‑citizens [1].
2. How lawful permanent residents and other non‑citizens are affected
Multiple trade and legal briefings note that permanent residents (green‑card holders) and visa holders face heightened risk of being turned back or denied boarding if they refuse biometric collection or fall within the flagged nationalities; sources warn green‑card travel could require facial scans starting Dec. 26, 2025 and refusal may lead to denial of entry even for returning permanent residents [1] [6]. Professional advisories stress that prior lawful admission does not guarantee future readmission under intensified vetting [7].
3. The 19‑country freeze and how it works
USCIS guidance and news outlets report a directive pausing adjudication of green‑card, asylum and naturalization applications filed by nationals of 19 countries and instituting re‑reviews of benefits granted since Jan. 20, 2021; the hold applies to a defined list of countries and to specified benefit categories, not to U.S. citizens [5] [2] [3]. Government statements frame the pause as a national‑security vetting measure [2] [3].
4. Travel‑ban expansion and administrative aims
Officials publicly signaled plans to widen restrictions beyond the June proclamation banning or restricting citizens of certain countries; Reuters and the White House note the administration’s intent to expand the list to more than 30 countries and to rely on presidential proclamations invoking national‑security concerns [4] [8]. Legal firms and outlets interpret these moves as strengthening INA 212(f)‑style vetting and discretionary adjudication authority [9].
5. Biometric rollout: technology, compliance and consequences
Reporting from specialist outlets describes a phased national rollout of mandatory facial‑recognition biometrics for all non‑citizens, published in the Federal Register with an effective date of Dec. 26, 2025; the rule uses photos (and may add other biometrics) and states refusals can lead to denied boarding or denial of entry for non‑citizens [1]. Industry guides and visa advisory sites reiterate the same consequence and urge travelers to expect longer processing [10].
6. Where confusion and misinformation arise
Confusion stems from two facts colliding: (a) the government’s actions are sweeping and affect millions of travelers and benefit applicants, and (b) reporting sometimes compresses “immigration applications paused” and “people denied entry” into alarming headlines. Several sources make clear the policies target non‑citizens or applicants from specified countries; they do not state that routine U.S. citizens are being refused reentry en masse [3] [2] [1]. KPMG and other advisories note increased device searches and selective secondary screening that can pull U.S. citizens aside for questioning — but they stop short of documenting wide‑scale citizen refusals [7].
7. Competing viewpoints and implicit agendas
Government and administration statements frame the measures as necessary national‑security steps [8] [2]. Legal and industry advisories present the changes as procedural and caution travel plans [9] [7]. Some media accounts and partisan outlets characterize the policies as broad suppression of immigration or as politically motivated vetting; those interpretations are present in reporting but the primary sources show the legal instruments used (presidential proclamations, USCIS memoranda, Federal Register rules) and emphasize targeted application [5] [1].
8. Practical guidance and limits of available reporting
If you are a U.S. citizen: available sources do not mention a general policy denying citizens reentry; most authoritative material distinguishes citizens from non‑citizens and focuses on biometric requirements for the latter and adjudication freezes for nationals of 19 countries [1] [5]. If you are a non‑citizen, permanent resident, or national of one of the listed countries: expect stricter vetting, possible re‑reviews of prior approvals, mandatory biometrics and potential denial of boarding/entry for refusal [1] [5] [3]. Available sources do not mention broader enforcement actions beyond these documented rules and memoranda; further developments should be watched in USCIS, DHS and Federal Register postings [5] [1].