Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Is us deporting us citizens
Executive summary
There is substantial reporting that U.S. immigration enforcement actions have, in some cases, detained and — rarely but documented — led to removal orders affecting U.S. citizens or people later shown to be citizens; investigative counts find more than 170 U.S. citizens have been held by immigration agents, and reporting and watchdogs have flagged up to 70 citizens deported in earlier periods [1] [2]. At the same time, the Department of Homeland Security publicly insists ICE does not deport citizens and says its operations are targeted [3].
1. What the investigations and reporting show: documented citizen detentions and mistaken removals
Long-form reporting by ProPublica and local outlets documents scores of U.S. citizens who have been arrested or detained by immigration agents — ProPublica’s tally and related reporting find “more than 170 U.S. citizens” have been held and describe cases of wrongful detention, physical mistreatment, and paperwork failures that left citizens in custody for hours or days [1] [4]. Separate summaries and historical reviews note prior government work that found up to roughly 70 citizens deported by ICE between 2015 and 2020, a figure cited by the Government Accountability Office and reflected in public summaries [2].
2. What DHS and ICE say in response: categorical denial and quality-control claims
The Department of Homeland Security has issued public statements vehemently denying that its operations intentionally deport U.S. citizens, asserting enforcement is “highly targeted” and that agents are trained to confirm status before arrest or removal; DHS framed some media stories as “false reporting” and repeatedly states “ICE does NOT arrest or deport U.S. citizens” [3] [5]. DHS releases emphasize procedural safeguards and deny broad systemic targeting of citizens [3].
3. Why both accounts can coexist: operational reality and error pathways
Reporting shows two dynamics that explain the tension: aggressive, wide-scope enforcement sweeps and data/identity confusion. Journalistic investigations describe interior enforcement sweeps in Latino communities where agents demanded proof of status and sometimes dismissed legitimate documents, producing wrongful detentions; prosecutors have not pursued charges in some contested episodes even where DHS later asserted citizen status issues [6] [1]. At the same time, the government’s inability or unwillingness to centrally track citizen detentions/removals makes it hard to reconcile DHS assurances with on-the-ground incidents [2] [1].
4. Scale and targets: massive deportation numbers, mostly noncitizens
Public and government statements emphasize very large deportation and self‑departure numbers in 2025: DHS and administration figures point to hundreds of thousands of removals and more than 1.6 million claimed self-deportations, while reporting and analysts note a dramatic ramp-up in detentions and removals under the current administration [7] [8] [9]. The bulk of these operations target noncitizens — critics’ accounts and official releases both focus on removing unauthorized immigrants — yet the documented cases show that enforcement intensity increases the chance of error affecting citizens [7] [9].
5. Legal and policy concerns raised by advocates and watchdogs
Civil‑liberties groups, immigration defense organizations, and investigative outlets warn that rapid deportation goals, expedited removal policies, and programs that reduce legal representation increase the risk of wrongful outcomes, including mistaken detention or removal of citizens; analyses of proposals such as Project 2025 argue accelerated procedures and cuts to legal aid make errors and family separations more likely [10]. Journalists and legal experts say courts have long required specific factual bases to detain someone as removable, and errors raise constitutional and statutory questions [6] [10].
6. What’s missing or unresolved in public reporting
Available sources do not provide a definitive, centralized government count of how many U.S. citizens have been detained or deported in 2025 beyond the investigative tallies and past GAO figures; the government itself is reported as “not tracking” detained or missing citizens comprehensively [2] [1]. DHS statements deny systemic deportation of citizens, but investigative stories describe multiple incidents where citizens were detained or issued removal notices — a factual disagreement that remains unresolved in public documentation [3] [1].
7. How to evaluate new claims going forward
When you see claims that “the U.S. is deporting citizens” apply three checks: look for independently verified case counts (ProPublica/OPB-style investigations), for official DHS/ICE responses or corrections, and for legal actions or GAO/inspector-general findings that confirm systemic error [1] [3] [2]. Both sides present evidence: independent journalism documents wrongful detentions and prior deportations, while DHS insists policies forbid deporting citizens — the factual dispute now centers on scale, systemic causes, and government tracking [1] [3].
Bottom line: investigative reporting documents dozens to hundreds of wrongful detentions of U.S. citizens and past instances of citizen deportations, while DHS publicly maintains it does not and does not intend to deport citizens; the lack of comprehensive government tracking means the disagreement about how widespread the problem is remains unresolved in available public sources [1] [2] [3].