Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Can US citizens with valid passports be detained by ICE for secondary inspection?

Checked on November 17, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Available reporting shows U.S. citizens with valid passports have in practice been stopped, restrained and in many cases held by ICE or other federal immigration officers during recent enforcement operations; ProPublica and multiple outlets document more than 50–170 such incidents and attorneys and lawmakers are pressing for investigation [1] [2] [3]. The government (DHS/ICE) publicly denies systematic detention of citizens but independent reporting, fact-checks and congressional letters say citizens were detained, questioned and sometimes held for days before release [4] [5] [6].

1. What the journalism documents: citizens have been detained during enforcement actions

Investigations by ProPublica and reporting re‑published across outlets find "more than 50 Americans" held after agents questioned their citizenship, and a broader tallied figure of over 170 U.S. citizens detained by immigration officers since the administration took office is widely cited in the press [1] [2]. NPR and other outlets recount cases where citizens were restrained, questioned and in some instances held for days, sometimes without charges, and where agents later said people were released after showing proof of citizenship [5] [1].

2. What official statements say: DHS and ICE deny deporting or targeting citizens

DHS issued statements calling some press stories "false and misleading" and asserting that "ICE does not arrest or detain U.S." citizens as part of targeted operations, arguing agents are trained to verify status and that arrests reflect lawful targeting or other criminal conduct [4]. That position conflicts with independent reporting and has been singled out in fact‑checks [3] [7].

3. Legal and policy background: limited authority to detain while verifying status

ICE and related agencies say they may detain individuals to secure presence for immigration proceedings or when they suspect someone is unlawfully in the U.S.; ICE’s public materials note detention is used to secure presence for proceedings and to manage removals [8]. Congressional concerns note ICE policy states it cannot use civil immigration authority to arrest U.S. citizens, even while acknowledging the agency has for decades sometimes arrested or even deported citizens in error [6].

4. How detention can happen at “secondary inspection” or during enforcement sweeps

Reporting describes episodes where federal agents conducting raids, workplace enforcement or court‑adjacent targeted detainments stopped people and held them while citizenship was questioned; some encountered citizens who later proved their status and were released, others were held for longer periods [1] [9]. ProPublica and local news accounts document cases—some captured on video—where people showing IDs (including REAL IDs or passports) were nonetheless detained temporarily while agents investigated [1] [2].

5. Disagreements among sources and official rebuttals

DHS emphatically contests reporting that it deports or systematically detains citizens and characterizes media accounts as inaccurate, while press investigations, civil‑rights groups, lawsuits and some lawmakers say the agency’s actions and record‑keeping show otherwise—creating a direct factual dispute [4] [6] [3]. Fact‑checkers (Poynter, PolitiFact, NPR) have concluded DHS’s categorical denials are contradicted by documented incidents [3] [7] [5].

6. Scale, oversight and record‑keeping remain contested and unclear

Multiple sources emphasize that the full scope is unclear because of poor ICE record‑keeping and limited public data; lawmakers have demanded internal DHS briefings and documents about how many citizens were stopped, arrested, detained or placed in proceedings, indicating gaps in transparency [6]. Investigations and litigation are ongoing, and the Guardian and other outlets report practices—like holding people in short‑term facilities or "hidden" rooms—that raise oversight questions [9].

7. Practical advice and implications for travelers and citizens (context, not legal counsel)

Journalistic accounts show that in practice citizens carrying passports or other ID have been detained temporarily while officers verify status; in many reported cases people were released after proof of citizenship, but several plaintiffs and lawmakers allege constitutional violations and wrongful prolonged detention [1] [2]. Available sources do not mention a single uniform rule that bars temporary detention during status verification; rather, they show a contested mix of agency practice, denials and legal challenges [8] [4].

Limitations: this summary relies on reporting, fact‑checks and official statements in the supplied sources; available sources do not provide a definitive legal checklist for every secondary‑inspection scenario and do not settle every disputed case listed above [2] [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
Under what circumstances can ICE detain a U.S. citizen at secondary inspection points?
What legal protections do U.S. citizens have during CBP secondary inspections at airports and borders?
How can a U.S. citizen challenge or appeal an ICE detention at arrival ports?
What rights to counsel and phone calls exist for U.S. citizens detained by immigration officers?
Are there recent court rulings or policy changes (2024–2025) affecting ICE detention of citizens during secondary inspections?