Are there ongoing criminal investigations or related civil suits connected to the same incidents involving candace owens?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
There are multiple civil legal actions connected to allegations made by Candace Owens — most prominently a 218–219 page defamation suit filed by French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte in Delaware Superior Court in July 2025 [1] [2]. Available sources do not report a criminal investigation or criminal charges against Owens herself tied to those same incidents; reporting instead documents federal and local law-enforcement probes into the September 2025 assassination of Charlie Kirk (which Owens has publicly disputed) and independent civil suits such as the Macrons’ defamation case [3] [4] [1].
1. The Macron lawsuit: a high‑stakes civil case, not a criminal charge
In July 2025 Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron filed a detailed, 218–219 page defamation complaint in Delaware against Candace Owens and related entities, accusing her of mounting a “campaign of global humiliation” by promoting the claim that Brigitte Macron was born male and seeking punitive damages and a jury trial [2] [1] [5]. Coverage from outlets including BBC, ABC and Fortune describes the suit as ongoing and notes it names Owens’ Delaware‑incorporated companies as defendants, turning her public commentary into formal civil exposure [1] [6] [2].
2. What the reporting says — civil exposure, not criminal culpability
News reports and legal filings focus on defamation and reputational harm. The Macrons’ complaint alleges Owens “disregarded all credible evidence” and amplified conspiracists, and plaintiffs explicitly seek civil remedies [1] [5]. Multiple outlets characterize the legal action as civil defamation litigation — there is no sourced reporting in the materials provided that the Macron filings allege criminal conduct by Owens or that prosecutors have filed criminal charges against her over these claims [1] [6] [2].
3. The Charlie Kirk assassination: active criminal investigation separate from Owens’ claims
Reporting around Charlie Kirk’s September 2025 assassination shows law-enforcement activity: authorities arrested Tyler Robinson and have treated him as the sole suspect, while federal investigators’ conclusions have been publicly stated and disputed by Owens on her platforms [3] [4] [7]. Sources note Owens has publicly promoted alternative theories and pressed for further inquiry, but the available coverage treats those as controversial assertions rather than proof of a separate criminal probe targeting Owens [8] [9] [4].
4. Overlap and public confusion: why civil and criminal threads get tangled
The overlap in public attention — Owens’ public accusations about Kirk’s death and her separate Macron‑related claims — has produced a confusing media ecosystem. Outlets document that Owens’ conspiracy claims about Kirk and her attacks on Turning Point USA rankled allies and drew explicit rebuttals from Charlie Kirk’s widow and TPUSA, while the Treasury sent a letter confirming TPUSA was not under IRS investigation after Owens raised financial allegations [4] [10] [11]. That swirl of claims explains why some readers conflate civil suits, policy inquiries and criminal investigations, but the sources separate them: the Macron matter is civil defamation, Kirk’s death is a criminal homicide investigation, and the Treasury letter addressed tax‑exempt status questions — not criminal charges against Owens [10] [11] [4].
5. Competing narratives and media agendas
Sources present starkly different framings. Legal and mainstream outlets (BBC, ABC, Fortune) emphasize the Macrons’ legal theory and civil remedies and describe Owens as a defendant in an important defamation suit [1] [6] [2]. Opinion and partisan outlets paint her either as a dangerous spreader of conspiracies or as a provocateur being targeted for speech — those outlets carry explicit editorial agendas that shape how they frame ongoing investigations and lawsuits [12] [13]. Readers should note the plaintiffs’ stated legal aims in the complaint and the media outlets’ differing missions when interpreting coverage [5] [2].
6. Limitations and what’s not in the sources
Available reporting in the provided set does not show any criminal indictment, criminal charges, or prosecution of Candace Owens tied to the Macron defamation claims or her public statements about Charlie Kirk; it also does not show a civil suit filed by TPUSA against Owens in these sources [1] [4]. Sources do document ongoing law‑enforcement work into Charlie Kirk’s killing and an active civil defamation case brought by the Macrons — but they do not link Owens to criminal proceedings in those matters [3] [1].
Bottom line: the public record in these sources shows active, high‑profile civil litigation against Owens (the Macrons’ Delaware defamation suit) and separate criminal investigation into Charlie Kirk’s assassination that Owens disputes; it does not, in these sources, show criminal charges against Owens arising from the same incidents [1] [3] [4].