Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are CBP biometric collection rules for U.S. citizens at ports of entry?
Executive Summary
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is expanding biometric collection at ports of entry primarily targeting non‑U.S. citizens, while U.S. citizens are generally not required to provide biometrics and may opt out of facial recognition in favor of manual inspection under current agency statements and recent rule language. The October 27, 2025 final rule formalizes mandatory photo capture for aliens at entry and exit and authorizes collection of additional biometrics for non‑exempt aliens, while CBP policy materials and past statements indicate short retention of U.S. citizen images (about 12 hours) and opt‑out procedures [1] [2] [3].
1. What the new rule actually mandates and whom it targets — clarity and limits
The Department of Homeland Security’s final rule published October 27, 2025, amends DHS regulations to require that all aliens (non‑U.S. citizens) be photographed upon entry and departure, and allows DHS to require additional biometrics from non‑exempt aliens such as fingerprints; the rule removes pilot and port limitations to permit collection at any departure location and becomes effective December 26, 2025 [1]. The rule text and agency summaries frame the collection as part of a comprehensive entry‑exit system to verify identity, prevent visa and document fraud, and to determine maintenance of immigration status. The rule explicitly addresses aliens, not U.S. citizens, as the population for mandatory biometric capture, thereby limiting the rule’s direct legal compulsion to non‑citizens [1].
2. How CBP treats U.S. citizens in practice — opt‑outs, retention, and signage
CBP public statements and oversight testimony indicate that U.S. citizens and certain exempt foreign nationals may decline facial biometric matching and request manual document checks, and that CBP implements notices or signage informing travelers of this opt‑out right [3]. CBP’s stated practice for facial images used for biometric matching is to retain images of U.S. citizens in secure systems for no more than 12 hours following identity verification, contrasting sharply with non‑citizen images that can be transferred to DHS biometric repositories and retained far longer [2] [3]. CBP’s operational deployments include airport and seaport systems where facial comparison is used at primary inspection points; these materials emphasize voluntary participation for citizens while noting that images may still be captured incidentally depending on processing flows [4] [3].
3. Conflicting reporting and where ambiguity remains — agency policy vs. rule language
Reporting and advocacy coverage highlight tensions between the formal rule language focused on aliens and documented instances where CBP used facial recognition on individuals who identified as U.S. citizens, prompting questions about routine practice and safeguards [5]. The final rule’s effective date and the agency’s statement on voluntary citizen participation create a legal and procedural boundary, but on‑the‑ground incidents and the widespread roll‑out of technology to hundreds of airports suggest operational ambiguity that critics argue could lead to mission creep and privacy concerns absent clearer statutory limits or enforcement guidance [2] [5] [4]. The sources show a divergence between legal compulsion (non‑citizens) and practical application (citizens can be subject to capture or matching if not properly routed to opt‑out).
4. Data retention, accuracy, and civil‑liberties debates — contrasting facts and concerns
CBP materials claim high matching accuracy and articulate retention policies that differentiate citizens from non‑citizens—citizen images: up to 12 hours; non‑citizen images: potentially decades via DHS biometrics systems—but reporting underscores concerns about algorithm accuracy, security, and lack of comprehensive federal biometric regulation [2]. Advocates and journalists point to instances of citizen encounters with facial recognition tools and call for statutory guardrails, citing constitutional implications and potential for misuse; CBP counters with operational necessity for fraud prevention and border security [5] [3]. The factual split is clear: DHS rulemaking and CBP statements set retention limits and opt‑outs for citizens, while public reporting and oversight narratives document contested operational practices and call for more transparent accountability.
5. Bottom line for travelers and unanswered procedural questions
For U.S. citizens traveling through ports of entry, the present evidentiary landscape shows no new statutory requirement to provide biometrics under the October 2025 rule; citizens retain the right to opt out of facial comparison and receive manual inspection, and citizen images used for matching are said to be retained briefly [1] [3]. Yet operational rollout across hundreds of airports and reported incidents where citizens were subjected to biometric tools underscore practical risks that travelers may encounter inadvertent capture or contested application of opt‑out rights, leaving important questions about signage, training, audit trails, redress, and enforcement unanswered. The documents and reporting together recommend close attention to CBP notices at ports, inspectors’ practices, and any future statutory or agency rulemaking that could alter the current citizen‑focused safeguards [4] [5] [2].