Have the police released any surveillance footage related to Charlie Kirk's death?

1. What the competing claims actually state — extracting the core assertions

News reports and official updates make three central claims: first, that the FBI released video of a suspected shooter fleeing the scene and offered it to the public as part of an appeal for information; second, that raw or graphic social-media video of the shooting circulated online but may not be the same material formally released by police; and third, that other police video—bodycam or previously obtained surveillance—has surfaced in separate contexts, including footage showing the accused interacting with officers in unrelated earlier incidents. These distinct claims address different media types and release channels — FBI public release, social-media leaks, and local police video releases — and must not be conflated ^{[2] [5] [6]}.

2. What video has been confirmed public and who posted it — sorting agency statements

The clearest, repeatedly cited release comes from the FBI: agencies publicly shared security video showing a man, identified later in reporting as the suspect, running across the rooftop and departing the scene; that clip was included in an FBI news update and shown at a press conference in September 2025 ^{[3] [4]}. Separate reporting states the FBI released a “video of a shooting suspect,” though some outlets describe it as surveillance footage while others call it security or released tape — the practical effect is the same: investigators distributed a clip to aid identification and witness development ^{[1] [2]}. Local law enforcement has also released or provided to media other footage elements under different circumstances, including historical police-interaction video involving the accused that predate the incident ^[6].

3. What the released footage actually shows and how investigators describe it

Published accounts describe the public footage as showing the suspect jumping from a roof, running across the roofline, and then climbing down toward wooded cover adjacent to the campus, consistent with investigators’ statements that the suspect fled on foot immediately after the shooting; those details were highlighted when the FBI and reporting outlets discussed the clip during their September 2025 updates ^{[2] [3]}. Authorities additionally reported recovering a bolt-action rifle believed to be used in the killing and said forensic analysis — including footwear and palm print comparisons — is ongoing, which frames the video as one piece of a broader evidentiary mosaic rather than the entirety of investigative material ^{[2] [4]}. Investigators have presented the footage as an identification and leads tool, not a complete case file.

4. Where reporting diverges — social media circulation versus official release

Some articles emphasize graphic social-media videos showing the final moments and aftermath of the shooting; that material circulated widely online and raised public-health concerns about trauma exposure, but it is distinct from the clips formally released by law enforcement and the FBI. Other reporting focuses on the FBI’s organized release and press conference distribution of security footage; the difference is important because social-media leaks can be unauthenticated or edited, while the FBI-distributed clips are framed as vetted investigative exhibits ^{[5] [4]}. Additionally, local reporting that obtained unrelated bodycam or past police videos of the accused — such as a traffic stop or earlier crash response — has created parallel narratives that can appear to expand the universe of “released footage” though those videos are not directly the crime scene surveillance sought by the FBI ^[6].

5. What remains unclear and why context matters for ongoing investigation

Public reporting confirms at least some surveillance/security footage has been released, but it is not transparent whether all available camera angles, raw files, or related campus recordings have been disclosed. Some outlets state the FBI released video “showing a suspected gunman,” while others note additional law-enforcement footage exists but has not been made public; that gap affects public understanding of what evidence investigators are withholding for investigative integrity versus what is being shared for public assistance ^{[1] [3]}. Forensic steps cited in reporting—rifle recovery, footwear and palm-print analysis—underscore that investigators treat released clips as one investigatory lever among many, and authorities continue to solicit tips while analyses proceed ^{[2] [4]}.

6. Bottom line and what to watch next

The factual bottom line: the FBI and law enforcement have released at least one security/surveillance clip tied to the Charlie Kirk killing and have publicly described its contents during September 2025 updates; other videos—social-media recordings and older police video about the accused—have circulated separately and can confuse the record if not distinguished ^{[2] [3] [6]}. Watch for formal updates from the FBI or county prosecutors, typically issued via press briefings or agency web pages, for disclosures of additional footage or forensic summaries; media outlets are likely to follow with detailed analyses and timestamps that clarify what has been released and what remains sealed. ^{[4] [1]}