Which attorneys are representing Charlie Kirk and the prosecution in the shooting trial?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Media reporting identifies the defense team for accused shooter Tyler Robinson as Kathryn Nester, Richard G. Novak and Michael N. Burt; Utah County prosecutors are led publicly by Utah County Attorney Jeff(rey) Gray, who announced charges and said prosecutors will seek the death penalty [1] [2] [3]. Coverage names Judge Tony Graf presiding and notes other attorneys and commentators connected to the case, but available sources do not list a specific lead prosecutor’s trial team beyond Jeff Gray [4] [5] [6].
1. Who is listed as Robinson’s defense team — names and roles
Local reporting and court photos identify Kathryn Nester as the defense attorney assigned to represent Tyler Robinson, joined on the defense team by Richard G. Novak and Michael N. Burt, who appeared in court with Nester at a waiver hearing [1]. News outlets describe Nester as the attorney who has filed procedural motions on Robinson’s behalf — for example seeking permission for Robinson to wear plain clothes — and contract records released to The Salt Lake Tribune show Utah County agreeing to pay more for this defense team than in some other capital cases [1].
2. Who is publicly identified as prosecuting the case
Utah County Attorney Jeff(rey) Gray is the publicly identified prosecutor who announced the formal charges and specific allegations against Robinson, including quoting an alleged note and indicating prosecutors will seek the death penalty [3] [7] [6]. Gray provided key details to reporters at the charging announcement and has been the named official speaking for the prosecution in multiple outlets [7] [3].
3. What sources say about trial counsel beyond the named lawyers
Court reporting and photos mention Judge Tony Graf presiding over the case; former prosecutors and local attorneys (for example Nathan Evershed) have commented on Graf’s background, but Evershed is not connected to Robinson’s defense or prosecution — he’s a commentator [4]. Media filings and motions have been filed by both Robinson’s attorneys and prosecutors seeking various protective or sealing orders; The Salt Lake Tribune and allied news organizations have pushed back, asking for transparency and notifications of future sealing requests [6].
4. What’s confirmed vs. what’s not in current reporting
Confirmed by multiple reports: Kathryn Nester, Richard G. Novak and Michael N. Burt are the defense attorneys appearing for Robinson [1] [2], and Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray is the publicly named prosecutor who announced charges and said the death penalty would be sought [3] [7] [6]. Available sources do not mention the names of an expanded state trial team or a designated lead trial prosecutor beyond Jeff Gray; detailed trial counsel lists (investigative prosecutors, assistant county attorneys who would try a capital case) are not provided in the cited reporting [6] [3].
5. How reporting frames motive, evidence and the prosecution’s posture
Prosecutors have described written and electronic material allegedly left by Robinson — including a note saying “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it” — and texts prosecutors say show admissions and motive tied to Kirk’s rhetoric; that narrative has been used to justify pursuing aggravated murder charges and a death-penalty stance [7] [8] [9]. News outlets emphasize voluminous discovery, with defense attorneys asking for time to review evidence and exploring preliminary-hearing strategy [10] [3] [9].
6. Points of contention and transparency concerns
Media organizations and a coalition led by The Salt Lake Tribune have formally objected to requests by both state and defense counsel to seal portions of court transcripts and minutes, arguing public scrutiny is vital; Utah County prosecutors and Robinson’s attorneys have sought some restrictions citing safety and privacy, illustrating competing interests between openness and protection in a high-profile death-penalty case [6]. That filing shows a friction point between press access advocates and the parties in the case [6].
7. What to watch next in court filings and coverage
Look for formal prosecutor team announcements in future court dockets or charging documents (not yet detailed in current reporting), any supplemental contracts listing additional defense counsel or investigators (the Tribune disclosed some contract details), and filings that name specific assistant prosecutors assigned to try a potential capital case — those specifics are not found in the sources provided here [1] [6]. Also watch motions about public access and discovery scheduling, which have already shaped media access and procedural timing [3] [6].
Limitations: this summary relies only on the cited articles; available sources name the defense attorneys Kathryn Nester, Richard G. Novak and Michael N. Burt and Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray as the prosecution’s public representative, but do not provide a comprehensive roster of every prosecutor or support staff who may ultimately try the case [1] [3] [6].