Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Chicago murder rate
Executive summary
Chicago’s homicide totals and rates fell sharply in 2025 compared with the pandemic-era peak in 2021: multiple city and national analyses report year‑to‑date homicide declines of roughly one‑third and projections that 2025 will finish well below recent highs (for example, 366 homicides listed midway through November and 278 through Aug. 31) [1] [2]. Independent analysts like the Council on Criminal Justice and news outlets also show large mid‑year declines in homicide rates — CCJ reported a first‑half 2025 homicide rate as low as 7 per 100,000 in one measure and a 33% year‑over‑year drop — but estimates and rankings vary by source and time period [3] [4] [5].
1. What the numbers are saying now: big drops, different measures
City officials and multiple outlets documented substantial year‑to‑date declines in 2025: the Chicago Police Department and mayor’s office reported roughly a 33% reduction in homicides through mid‑2025 and fewer than 500 homicides projected for the full year [6] [5]. Local reporting in November cited 366 homicides through Nov. 7, 2025, and the city’s own August update noted 278 homicides through Aug. 31 — different snapshots that both point to a marked decline from the 805 homicides recorded in 2021 [1] [2] [7].
2. Rates vs. counts: why rankings and “rate” statements diverge
Several outlets convert counts into rates (per 100,000 residents) and compare Chicago to other large cities; those conversions produce differing conclusions depending on the window used. CCJ’s mid‑year work showed Chicago’s homicide rate for the first half of 2025 at about 7 per 100,000 in one calculation and reported a 33% decline in homicides year‑over‑year for that period [3] [4]. By contrast, some local summaries and mid‑year rankings placed Chicago among the top‑10 or higher on certain lists (for example a mid‑2025 ranking of 7th by one outlet, or a cited figure of 28.7 per 100,000 in another mid‑year snapshot) — these differences reflect distinct denominators, timeframes, and which cities are included in comparisons [8].
3. How short‑term trends can mislead: seasonal and methodological factors
Crime researchers warn that short windows — month‑to‑month or half‑year snapshots — can overstate long‑term change or be skewed by which cities report which offenses. CCJ explicitly cautioned that trends for small numbers of cities or short intervals require care, and that some declines were driven by a few high‑violence cities [9] [3]. City press releases emphasizing “safest summer since 1965” or lowest monthly counts since 2014 rely on specific month‑by‑month comparisons that may not capture longer cycles [2] [5].
4. Disagreements, political spin, and fact‑checking
Political actors have used these figures both to defend and to criticize city leadership. FactCheck.org examined claims (for example Gov. Pritzker’s rebuttals) and found that while murders have fallen since 2021, some precise rate‑cut claims were not fully supported by the data available — illustrating how statistical language (absolute counts, rates, proportional drops) is weaponized in political debate [4]. The White House and conservative outlets have at times presented contrasting narratives emphasizing persistent problems or different comparisons [10] [8]; readers should note the underlying agendas when outlets highlight particular metrics.
5. Other context: clearance rates, concentrated violence, and comparisons
Officials point to improved homicide clearance rates (the mayor’s office cited clearance near or above 70% in 2025) as part of the narrative for public‑safety improvement, while analysts note that violence remains highly concentrated in certain neighborhoods and demographic groups [2] [7]. Some analyses flagged that while homicides fell, arrest rates and certain outcomes (like motor‑vehicle theft) showed different trends, and that declines in homicide may not be evenly distributed across the city [11] [9].
6. What to watch next: data updates and apples‑to‑apples comparisons
To track Chicago’s murder rate responsibly, compare the same measure over consistent timeframes (calendar year vs. rolling 12 months vs. half‑year), and note whether numbers are raw counts or rates per 100,000 residents. Independent periodic reviews such as CCJ’s mid‑year reports, city data portals, and fact‑checks provide complementary perspectives: CCJ and city reports document large 2025 declines [3] [6], while fact‑checking highlights where political claims overreach the available metrics [4].
Limitations and bottom line: reporting and analyses agree that 2025 saw substantial declines from the 2021 peak, but estimates of “how much” and Chicago’s relative national rank depend on the timeframe, whether you use raw counts or rates, and which comparator cities or windows are chosen — the sources above document the decline while also showing why numbers have been reframed by different parties [1] [3] [4].