Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Chicago's no arrest policy

Checked on September 10, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The claim of Chicago's "no arrest policy" is not directly supported or contradicted by the analyses provided [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. However, some sources suggest that the city's low arrest rates, particularly for homicide cases, may be related to the claim, with only 23% of homicide cases resulting in an arrest [1]. Other sources mention that Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has rejected calls to crackdown on crime in Chicago, which could be related to the claim [2]. Additionally, some sources provide data on crime in Chicago, suggesting that the city's crime rate is not as high as claimed by some [3]. Key points to note are that the sources do not directly address a "no arrest policy", but rather discuss related issues such as low arrest rates, crime data, and law enforcement policies.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some important context is missing from the original statement, including the fact that the Chicago Police Department has revised its search warrant policy to minimize trauma and intrusion [5], and that the Cook County State’s Attorney has scrapped do-not-call and disclosure lists, which can lead to wrongful convictions and police misconduct [4]. Alternative viewpoints are also present, such as the idea that the city's no-cash bail policy has led to the release of violent suspects who go on to commit further crimes [7] [9]. Different stakeholders may benefit from different policies, such as law enforcement, crime victims, and community members, highlighting the need for a nuanced understanding of the issues [1] [2] [3].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading or biased, as it implies a blanket "no arrest policy" in Chicago, which is not supported by the analyses [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. Certain groups may benefit from this framing, such as those seeking to criticize the city's law enforcement policies or promote a particular political agenda [2] [7]. A more accurate understanding of the issues would require considering the complexities of crime and law enforcement in Chicago, including the city's low arrest rates, crime data, and law enforcement policies [1] [3] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the crime statistics in Chicago since the no arrest policy was implemented?
How does Chicago's no arrest policy compare to other major US cities' policing strategies?
What are the arguments for and against Chicago's no arrest policy from a law enforcement perspective?
How has the no arrest policy affected community relationships with the Chicago Police Department?
What role does the Chicago no arrest policy play in the broader conversation about police reform in the US?