Fact check: In which country child porn videos is legal..? Tell me country names

1. Summary of the results

Based on the comprehensive analyses provided, child pornography videos are not legal in any country. The sources consistently debunk several viral misinformation claims that have circulated online:

• Germany has not decriminalized child pornography despite widespread false claims on social media. German lawmakers reduced minimum jail terms for possessing, distributing, or acquiring child pornography to allow for more proportional sentencing, particularly in cases involving adolescents, but the material remains illegal ^{[1] [2]}.
• The United Nations has not endorsed decriminalizing sex with children. Claims suggesting this stem from mischaracterizations of an International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) report that focused on consensual sexual activities between adolescents, not adult-child sexual relations ^[3].
• International law enforcement actively prosecutes child sexual exploitation. Sources document major operations including the shutdown of "Kidflix," a child sexual abuse platform with nearly two million users ^[4], and prosecutions spanning five continents ^[5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question appears to be based on false premises propagated through misinformation campaigns. Several important contextual factors are missing:

• Legal reforms are often misrepresented: Changes in sentencing guidelines, such as Germany's adjustment of minimum penalties, are frequently distorted online to falsely suggest decriminalization ^{[1] [2]}.
• International cooperation against child exploitation is extensive: Law enforcement agencies worldwide collaborate on major operations, with the EU hosting significant amounts of reported child sexual abuse material not because it's legal, but because of robust reporting mechanisms ^[6].
• Misinformation spreads rapidly on social media: False claims about countries allegedly legalizing child pornography serve to undermine trust in institutions and legal systems, potentially benefiting those who profit from spreading divisive content or conspiracy theories.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains significant misinformation and harmful assumptions:

• False premise: The question assumes that child pornography is legal somewhere, which contradicts all available evidence from legitimate sources ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [5]}.
• Potential harm: Seeking information about where such material might be legal could facilitate illegal activity or spread dangerous misinformation.
• Viral misinformation patterns: The question reflects common online conspiracy theories that have been systematically debunked, particularly claims about Germany and UN policies ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

The question appears to be influenced by deliberate misinformation campaigns that distort legitimate policy discussions about proportional sentencing and adolescent rights into false claims about legalizing child exploitation.