Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which cities have implemented policies to protect trans individuals from violence and discrimination?
Executive summary
Local governments across the U.S. are a major locus of protections for transgender people: as of April 1, 2025 at least 395 municipalities — plus Washington, D.C. and 21 states — had explicit nondiscrimination ordinances covering LGBTQ people in employment, housing and public accommodations [1]. Human Rights Campaign’s Municipal Equality Index documents dozens of cities that adopt trans‑inclusive municipal policies and services; 132 cities scored a perfect 100 in the 2025 MEI, including Salt Lake City called out by HRC [2] [3].
1. Cities as the frontline: how municipal ordinances protect trans people
Across the U.S., cities and counties have often filled gaps left by state or federal policy by passing local nondiscrimination ordinances that explicitly enumerate gender identity, covering employment, housing and public accommodations; Movement Advancement Project counted at least 395 such municipalities as of April 1, 2025 [1]. HRC’s Municipal Equality Index measures municipal laws, services, and leadership on LGBTQ equality and highlights cities that go further — for example, Salt Lake City scored 100 in 2025 for a package of municipal protections and pro‑trans symbolic steps like city flags [2] [3].
2. Which cities have concrete, documented protections?
Detailed, city‑level lists are compiled by advocacy trackers rather than every single source here, but Movement Advancement Project’s database (cited by its summary) and HRC’s MEI provide searchable inventories of the municipalities that have adopted explicit nondiscrimination protections and other measures [1] [3]. The Pennsylvania Attorney General’s office also notes specific Pennsylvania cities — Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Allentown, Erie and Reading — among over 50 municipalities in that state with local LGBTQ nondiscrimination ordinances [4]. For exhaustive, city‑by‑city names, consult MAP’s “City and County Listing” or HRC’s MEI scorecards referenced above [1] [3].
3. What “protection” typically means at the city level
Local protections commonly include ordinances prohibiting discrimination on the basis of gender identity in private and public employment, housing and public accommodations, municipal employment policies that include trans‑inclusive benefits, law enforcement trainings or protocols for responding to anti‑trans violence, and municipal services such as health‑care referrals — all criteria used in HRC’s MEI [3]. Movement Advancement Project explicitly counts ordinances that “fully and explicitly prohibit discrimination” in employment, housing and public accommodations when compiling its municipal totals [1].
4. Why city protections matter now — and their limits
Cities can and do create immediate, enforceable protections for residents even when state or federal law is hostile; HRC notes cities scoring high despite restrictive state laws and designates “All‑Star” cities that earn top marks in unfriendly states [3]. But sources also make clear limits: enforcement mechanisms vary by jurisdiction and local laws cannot fully insulate residents from state or federal rollbacks or threats — the Movement Advancement Project cautions that enforcement and scope differ across municipalities [1] [5].
5. National context: rising attacks and why local action increased
Multiple organizations documented an escalation of anti‑trans bills and federal actions in 2024–2025, which has pushed cities to respond locally; trackers such as TransLegislation and Outright International catalog the surge of restrictive measures, and media analyses describe federal executive orders and Project 2025 as drivers of a coordinated rollback that increases pressure on local governments to protect residents [6] [7] [8]. The ACLU and other groups are tracking state‑level legislative activity and court challenges that interact with municipal efforts [9] [10].
6. Competing perspectives and political dynamics
Advocacy groups and city officials present municipal nondiscrimination laws as necessary life‑saving protections; HRC’s MEI frames local action as essential amid “a dire national state of emergency” for LGBTQ people [3] [2]. Opposing political actors and federal policy initiatives in 2025 argue for restrictions framed as protecting women or children — for example, the White House issued orders in January 2025 defining policy around binary sexes — and some states have passed or considered laws that undercut local protections [11] [12]. Available sources document both the municipal responses and the wave of state/federal actions that complicate their reach [1] [11].
7. Where to go next for a city list and practical steps
For a searchable, city‑by‑city list consult Movement Advancement Project’s City and County Listing and HRC’s Municipal Equality Index scorecards — both are cited by summaries in the reporting above as the primary inventories of local nondiscrimination ordinances and municipal policies [1] [3]. For individuals seeking safety or relocation guidance, community resources such as TransLash’s relocation guide recommend using those tools and local provider directories to evaluate cities’ protections and healthcare access [13].
Limitations: the sources here summarize national databases and highlight examples (Salt Lake City; Pennsylvania cities) but do not publish a single exhaustive list in the snippets provided; for full, current city names and ordinance text, consult the MAP and HRC resources directly as cited [1] [3].