Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

What civil findings or damages have been awarded against Donald Trump for sexual misconduct allegations?

Checked on November 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Two civil verdicts tied to E. Jean Carroll are the only awards in U.S. courts explicitly documented in the provided reporting: a May 2023 jury found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll and awarded her $5 million, and a separate January 2024 jury awarded Carroll about $83.3 million for defamation tied to his post‑accusation statements (both awards have been the subject of appeals) [1] [2] [3].

1. The headline cases: E. Jean Carroll’s two civil verdicts

In May 2023 a Manhattan jury found Trump liable in a civil trial for sexually abusing writer E. Jean Carroll in the 1990s and awarded a total of roughly $5 million — reported breakdowns include $2 million for the sexual‑abuse finding and smaller punitive amounts — and in January 2024 another jury awarded Carroll approximately $83.3 million for defamatory comments Trump made while president; both verdicts are being litigated on appeal [1] [2] [3].

2. What those awards cover and how they were reached

The $5 million civil judgment flowed from the jury’s finding that Trump sexually abused Carroll in a department‑store dressing room in the mid‑1990s; pieces of evidence cited during the trial included witness testimony and contemporaneous material presented by Carroll’s lawyers, and the later $83.3 million award was for repeated defamation on social media and in public statements denying and disparaging Carroll’s accusations [3] [2] [1].

3. Appeals and continuing litigation — the legal status is unsettled

Reporting shows these judgments have not been final in the broader sense: the cases have been appealed and additional filings — including Trump asking higher courts to reconsider aspects such as presidential immunity and trial rulings — mean the ultimate enforceability or reduction of awards could change as appellate courts review the record [4] [5] [3].

4. Broader landscape: numerous allegations but few civil awards documented here

Available sources document that since the 1970s at least dozens of women have accused Trump of various sexual misconduct acts, and journalists and books have collated many allegations; however, the reporting provided cites only the Carroll civil findings as court judgments awarding damages [6] [7]. Sources do not list other civil damage awards against Trump for sexual misconduct within the supplied material — “available sources do not mention” additional court awards beyond Carroll in this set [6].

5. What supporters and critics emphasize about the Carroll verdicts

Proponents of the verdicts and some courts have characterized the large defamation award as justified by what judges called “extraordinary and egregious” statements and an ongoing campaign of disparagement, while Trump and his lawyers argue procedural errors, disputes over evidence and legal doctrines (including assertions of immunity for official acts) warrant reversal — these competing perspectives are reflected in reporting on appeals and Supreme Court filings [8] [5] [4].

6. How journalists and outlets frame significance and limits

News outlets emphasize the Carroll rulings as historically notable because they represent a civil finding of sexual abuse against a former president and substantial defamation damages, yet they also note legal complexity: the civil standard of proof differs from criminal cases, the awards have been appealed, and civil liability does not equate to criminal conviction — those caveats appear throughout coverage [1] [2] [3].

7. Related reporting that may affect context but is not a damage award

Other provided documents discuss allegations, contemporaneous materials (books, witness accounts), and newly released documents about Jeffrey Epstein’s knowledge that may bear on broader public debate about behavior and networks — but those items in the record are not presented as civil judgments awarding damages against Trump in the supplied sources [9] [10] [7].

8. Bottom line for someone asking “what damages have been awarded”

Based on the reporting you provided: the concrete, court‑entered awards tied to sexual‑misconduct allegations are the roughly $5 million judgment finding Trump liable for sexual abuse (May 2023) and the approximately $83.3 million defamation award tied to his statements about E. Jean Carroll (January 2024); both remain subject to appeal and further judicial review [1] [2] [3].

Limitations: this summary relies only on the documents you supplied; if you want a wider sweep of court dockets, settlements, or more recent rulings beyond these items, I can search additional reporting or legal filings.

Want to dive deeper?
What civil judgments has Donald Trump personally been ordered to pay in sexual misconduct or defamation cases?
How much did E. Jean Carroll win in her defamation and sexual assault suits against Donald Trump and what appeals followed?
Were any punitive damages or treble damages awarded against Trump in sexual misconduct-related civil cases?
Which courts (state or federal) issued civil rulings against Trump over sexual misconduct claims and what were their legal bases?
Have any civil awards against Trump been collected, stayed, reduced, or satisfied, and how does enforcement work?