What other federal or state civil judgments against the Trump Organization resulted in asset turnover or receivership actions?

1. The New York attorney general’s civil fraud ruling: the primary instance of receivership orders

In a high-profile New York state civil case, Justice Arthur Engoron issued a partial summary judgment finding that Donald Trump, his adult sons and the Trump Organization committed fraud by inflating asset values, and he ordered termination of certain New York business licenses and the placement of implicated entities into receivership to protect potential remedies — an outcome described in multiple reports as risking loss of control over marquee properties ^{[1] [2] [5]}.

2. The court actually granted receivership authority and contemplated asset turnover to satisfy remedies

Coverage of the decision emphasized that the court’s receivership remedy was intended to ensure funds or assets would be available to satisfy any disgorgement or monetary judgment that followed, with a receiver to manage and preserve assets while the litigation proceeds and appeals are resolved ^{[3] [6]}. Media accounts framed the order as a tool to backstop a potential damages award and to prevent the transfer or concealment of assets that could frustrate enforcement ^[3].

3. Appellate responses, stays and the ongoing appeals process

Within days of Engoron’s decision, appellate proceedings intervened: a New York appellate court issued a stay halting cancellation of business certificates, receivership and dissolution orders, a development highlighted by Legal Dive and quoted by Trump’s attorneys as vindication of the rule of law while appeals proceed ^[4]. The trial-court remedies therefore have been enjoined pending appellate review, and multiple outlets note that prolonged appellate litigation is expected ^{[1] [4]}.

4. No other federal or state civil judgments producing receivership are documented in the provided reporting

The materials supplied and cited in this analysis repeatedly center on the New York AG case as the instance where a civil judgment threatened turnover and receivership; other sources in the set track litigation against Trump more broadly but do not identify another federal or state civil judgment that produced receivership or compelled asset turnover of the Trump Organization in the same way ^[7]. Where reporting mentions receivership or corporate dissolution in the Trump context, it traces back to the Engoron/James action ^{[2] [5] [6]}.

5. Competing narratives and implicit agendas in coverage

Newspapers and legal outlets reported both the AG’s rationale — preventing asset shuffling to evade a future monetary remedy — and the defense’s portrayal of the orders as overreach; Trump lawyers hailed appellate action as halting “cancellation of business certificates, receivers or dissolution,” framing the litigation as politically motivated and beyond the case’s scope ^[4]. Readers should note that outlets like PBS and TheRealDeal emphasize practical implications for property management and valuation, while opinion and advocacy lines sometimes foreground broader political implications of taking companies into court-ordered receivership ^{[3] [6]}.

6. Conclusion and limits of available reporting

Based on the reporting provided, the New York Attorney General’s civil fraud action is the only state civil judgment in this dataset that resulted in a court ordering cancellation of business certificates and seeking receivership/asset control measures against the Trump Organization; appellate stays have temporarily blocked enforcement and the matter remains subject to appeal ^{[1] [4] [5]}. This account is constrained to the sources given; if other federal or state civil judgments with turnover or receivership results exist, they are not documented in the material supplied for this analysis ^[7].