What are the most common types of hate crimes reported by the FBI since 2020?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The FBI’s published hate-crime tallies since 2020 show bias based on race, ethnicity, or ancestry as the single largest category of reported incidents, followed by religion and sexual orientation in most annual releases [1] [2]. Annual reports and summaries for 2023–2024 note that anti-Black or African American incidents represent the largest subgroup among race/ethnicity/ancestry bias reports, while anti-Jewish and anti-Latino/Hispanic incidents are also prominent in recent years [3]. Aggregate totals published for 2024 reported roughly eleven thousand incidents, with the FBI and advocacy groups highlighting year-to-year fluctuations such as a modest decrease in overall reported incidents from 2023 to 2024 [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Reported FBI totals reflect law-enforcement submissions and are widely acknowledged to understate actual bias-motivated incidents because participation in the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting program is voluntary and victims often do not report to police [5]. Different agencies and civil-society groups use alternative measures — victimization surveys, local agency audits, or community reporting portals — that sometimes show different trends or higher counts, particularly for underreported groups such as people with disabilities or transgender people [5]. Temporal comparisons also require care: single-year spikes (for example in anti-LGBTQ incidents in 2023) can reflect discrete events, changes in reporting practices, or outreach that increases reporting rather than underlying prevalence [3] [2].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
Framing “most common types” strictly by FBI-reported categories benefits narratives that treat official counts as complete measures; this can minimize unseen or underreported harms and privilege law-enforcement-derived data over community-based counts [5] [2]. Conversely, advocacy organizations citing higher community reports may emphasize systemic underreporting to press for policy change, which can be interpreted as inflating trends if not compared to FBI methodology [3]. Accurate public understanding requires noting methodological limits: which agencies submit data, how bias motivations are classified, and how single-year changes may reflect reporting variations rather than durable shifts in incidence [6] [5].