Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

How do ICE 2025 PFT standards compare to CBP, FBI, and TSA entry requirements?

Checked on November 19, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

ICE’s 2025 Pre‑Employment/Academy Physical Fitness Test (PFT) is described as a four‑event timed battery used to screen and to ensure trainees can meet academy demands [1]. CBP uses multiple PFT formats across officer and Border Patrol pipelines (run, push‑ups, sit‑ups, lift/lower cycles and a 1.5‑mile run in some exercises) and a Fitness Graduation Standard for academy graduation [2] [3]. The FBI and TSA both require fitness or medical assessments for their law‑enforcement tracks but publish less standardized, public numeric PFT details in the provided materials: the FBI says applicants must “meet our physical fitness requirements” as part of Special Agent selection [4] [5], while TSA’s hiring emphasizes medical/vision/hearing screens and a cognitive CBT test; TSA Federal Air Marshal and some TSA programs do use a Physical Training Assessment (PTA) [6] [7].

1. ICE 2025: Job‑specific four‑event PFT, early and mandatory

ICE’s 2025 materials describe the PFT as “a fitness test consisting of 4 timed events” and emphasize the test predicts ability to meet academy and on‑the‑job demands; failure of any event means failing the entire PFT and can remove a selectee from the hiring process after a second failed attempt [1]. DHS documents and ICE guidance reiterate that recruits must meet agency Physical Ability Assessment standards as a condition of employment, and DHS said ICE is moving fitness checks earlier in training rather than lowering standards [8] [9].

2. CBP: Multiple agency tests, practical exercise emphasis

Customs and Border Protection presents several, slightly different PFT batteries depending on path (CBP Officer, Border Patrol Agent, Air and Marine Operations) and uses a two‑part test and a Fitness Graduation Standard tied to academy progress. Published CBP guidance lists timed push‑ups, sit‑ups, an agility lift/lower cycle, and in some versions a 1.5‑mile run and flexibility measures; the Fletc/CBP materials frame the FGS as a practical exercise candidates must pass to graduate [2] [3]. In short: CBP’s tests are multi‑component, vary by job pipeline, and are embedded into training graduation criteria [2] [3].

3. FBI: Requirement to “meet” fitness standards, but fewer public numeric details

FBI recruiting pages state applicants for Special Agent must “meet our physical fitness requirements” and complete medical exams, vaccinations, and a PFT as part of the selection and academy process [4] [5]. The provided FBI materials focus on eligibility rules, security clearance and background checks; they emphasize fitness as mandatory but do not publish a single public four‑event numeric standard in the sources supplied here [4] [5]. External reporting (not in these FBI pages) suggests debates inside the Bureau about changing recruitment standards, but those articles are separate from the FBI’s own statements cited above [10]. Available sources do not mention specific FBI PFT event names or pass scores in the supplied documents.

4. TSA: Cognitive/medical focus for many hires; PTAs for law‑enforcement tracks

TSA’s 2025 public hiring guidance in the supplied results centers on the Computer‑Based Test (CBT/TAB) and on medical/vision/hearing/drug screens as early gating elements for Transportation Security Officers. For law‑enforcement streams such as Federal Air Marshal candidates, TSA uses a Physical Training Assessment (PTA) to evaluate fitness for training [6] [7]. The supplied TSA items emphasize cognitive testing and medical screens; they do not provide a single, universal TSA numeric PFT for all hires in the materials here [6] [7]. Available sources do not mention a TSA‑wide four‑event timed PFT analogous to ICE’s four‑event description.

5. How they compare — framing and operational differences

  • Structure and publicity: ICE publicly frames a clear, four‑event timed PFT for academy entry and graduation [1]. CBP publishes several job‑specific batteries and a Fitness Graduation Standard integrated with training [2] [3]. FBI and TSA require applicants to “meet” fitness/medical requirements and apply PTAs for specific law‑enforcement tracks, but the supplied FBI/TSA sources do not list a single public numeric four‑event battery comparable to ICE’s public description [4] [5] [7].
  • Purpose and timing: ICE and CBP explicitly use PFTs as gatekeepers for academy success and job readiness [1] [3]. FBI fitness screening is part of the Special Agent vetting and academy cycle [4]. TSA’s screening prioritizes medical, sensory and cognitive assessments for most TSOs but reserves PTAs for air marshal training and similar programs [6] [7].
  • Variation and transparency: CBP shows the most pipeline variation with multiple test formats [2]. ICE’s four‑event PFT is presented as standardized across its recruiting streams in the supplied ICE page [1]. FBI and TSA are more opaque in the publicly available materials provided here regarding exact event lists and pass marks [4] [7].

6. Limitations, disagreements and what’s not in the record

The supplied sources do not publish detailed numeric pass‑scores or the exact four ICE events in full in these snippets [1]. The FBI materials assert a fitness requirement but do not include the test breakdown or scoring publicly in the files provided [4] [5]. Reporting that federally questions changes to FBI hiring standards exists elsewhere but is not fully detailed in the FBI job pages here [10]. Available sources do not mention direct side‑by‑side numeric comparisons (e.g., push‑up counts or run times across agencies) in the supplied documents — that data is simply not presented in these search results.

If you want, I can pull the exact event names and scoring ranges from the ICE PFT page and CBP PFT guidance (or search for FBI/TSA PFT numeric standards) and produce a side‑by‑side numeric table — tell me which agencies or candidate pipelines (HSI Special Agent, ERO/DOTP, CBP Officer, Border Patrol, FBI Special Agent, TSA FAM) you want compared.

Want to dive deeper?
What are the specific physical fitness test components for ICE 2025 PFT and their scoring standards?
How do CBP, FBI, and TSA physical or medical entry requirements differ from ICE 2025 PFT in pass/fail thresholds?
Have any agencies updated physical fitness standards since 2023 and what motivated those changes?
How do career field exceptions, waivers, or gender-neutral scoring apply across ICE, CBP, FBI, and TSA?
What training programs and timelines help recruits meet ICE 2025 PFT compared with other agencies' prep expectations?