Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How do ICE fitness standards compare to those for Border Patrol, TSA, and federal law enforcement in 2025?
Executive summary
ICE’s hiring Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for HSI special agents is a four-event timed battery with strict minimums and a two-attempt rule; ICE moved fitness checks earlier in training in 2025 but the agency says it did not lower standards [1] [2]. Border Patrol/CBP fitness programs use slightly different PFT formats tied to their operational demands—CBP and Border Patrol emphasize job-related, validated standards and endurance for rugged border duties, and Border Patrol applicants face a three-part or other PFTs during hiring and academy conditioning [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Available sources do not provide a single table comparing exact event-by-event minima for ICE, Border Patrol, TSA, or other federal agencies in 2025; reporting and agency pages describe different test structures and rationales rather than identical metrics [1] [8] [3] [4].
1. What ICE requires: a four-event, pass-every-item PFT and tighter timing
ICE’s HSI selection uses a four-event PFT with timed events and “minimum standards” for each event; failing any single event equals failing the whole test, and candidates who fail once must retest within 45 days or are removed after a second failure [1]. The agency frames those standards as “job-related” and intended to predict ability to meet academy and on-the-job demands [1]. Reporting in 2025 notes ICE shifted fitness checks earlier in the training pipeline — ICE’s leadership said this is to “improve efficiency and accountability” and maintained it was not a lowering of standards [2].
2. How CBP/Border Patrol fitness rules emphasize endurance and field readiness
CBP’s public materials state that CBP fitness standards are applied during selection and training, are job-related, and are validated to predict academy and job performance; they assert the tests are the same for all applicants and “not based on race, age or sex” [4]. Border Patrol-specific recruiting guidance and third-party explainers describe a multi-part PFT (often cited as three parts in hiring materials) and emphasize endurance, stamina and conditioning for long foot patrols in harsh terrain — reflecting Border Patrol’s operational emphasis on field endurance in remote environments [5] [7] [6]. Journalistic and trade reporting repeats that Border Patrol training at FLETC includes extensive physical conditioning tied to those duties [8] [7].
3. TSA and other federal agencies: sparse direct public comparisons in these sources
Available sources do not mention TSA’s 2025 fitness standards or provide a direct description of TSA physical testing in the materials supplied here; likewise, there is no comprehensive, cross-agency comparison chart among ICE, Border Patrol, TSA, and other federal law‑enforcement agencies in the documents provided (not found in current reporting). The supplied sources focus on ICE and CBP/Border Patrol and on general hiring steps for federal law enforcement [1] [8] [3] [4].
4. Why standards differ: job role, validation, and operational context
Agency pages and training accounts make clear the fitness tests are designed around “job-related” tasks and academy requirements — so ICE’s four-event PFT for HSI special agents reflects investigative and law-enforcement duties, while Border Patrol/CBP PFTs stress endurance and field performance for patrols and apprehensions on rugged terrain [1] [4] [8]. Independent recruiting and training sites echo that Border Patrol candidates must prepare for long hours and physically demanding field tasks not necessarily identical to ICE desk or investigative assignments [7] [6].
5. Conflicting narratives and what to watch for in reporting
The Atlantic’s reporting flagged operational changes at ICE in 2025 and reported that some field offices saw many candidates fail fitness checks after the timing shift, prompting legal guidance on revoking offers; ICE officials insisted the change was procedural and not a standards reduction [2]. That illustrates competing narratives: agency leadership frames procedural tweaks as efficiency measures, while reporting can surface operational friction and local consequences. Readers should watch agency PFT pages and follow-up reporting for published numeric minima and any formal policy memos clarifying pass/fail rates or changes [1] [2].
6. Bottom line for applicants and policymakers
Applicants should prepare for agency-specific, validated PFTs: ICE HSI applicants face a four-event timed PFT with strict per-event minima and limited retest opportunities [1]; Border Patrol/CBP candidates should train for endurance and multipart PFTs aligned with FLETC academy demands [8] [4]. For cross-agency comparisons or exact event minima (reps, distances, times, age/sex adjustments), available sources here do not supply a complete event-by-event comparison — prospective applicants should consult each agency’s official careers/PFT page for current numeric standards [1] [4].