How do ICE detention death rates compare with other U.S. detention systems?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
ICE custody saw a sharp rise in deaths in 2025, with multiple outlets reporting at least 15–25 deaths so far this year and ICE’s detained population rising toward ~60–66,000 — both trends that advocates say raise the system’s death rate and absolute fatalities [1] [2] [3]. Independent reviews and advocacy groups say most ICE deaths reviewed were preventable and point to systemic medical failures; direct comparisons of standardized death rates between ICE, jails, prisons and federal Bureau of Prisons facilities are not provided in the sources [4] [5] [6].
1. A spike in ICE deaths amid rapid expansion — raw counts, not standardized rates
Multiple journalism and advocacy sources document a notable increase in the number of people dying in ICE custody in 2025 — reporting figures ranging from at least 15 deaths through September to 23–25 deaths reported by other outlets — while the detained population grew roughly 50–70% since January, to about 60,000–66,000 detainees [3] [1] [2]. These sources present raw death counts and note the expanding population, but they do not all calculate a uniform deaths-per-10,000 person-years metric across systems, so comparisons based solely on these counts risk misleading conclusions [5] [6].
2. Advocates: most ICE deaths were preventable — shows system-level failures
A coalition report led by the ACLU, Physicians for Human Rights and others reviewed 52 ICE deaths from 2017–2021 and concluded 95% “could likely have been prevented with adequate medical care,” citing failed oversight, flawed investigations and poor medical documentation [4]. Reporting from The Marshall Project and other outlets echoes that medical neglect, delayed care and deteriorating mental-health services are recurring explanations for deaths in ICE custody [7].
3. Media and advocacy calculate provisional death rates but differ on framing
Opinion and reporting pieces have attempted per-capita calculations: one analysis in The Hill annualized a 2025 figure to about 2.7–4.0 deaths per 10,000 detainees depending on assumptions — a calculation driven by the year’s rising detainee totals — and argued that an expanded detention population will raise absolute preventable deaths even if per-capita rates appear similar [5]. Other outlets emphasize the raw increase in fatalities and describe 2025 as the deadliest year for ICE custody since 2004 or 2020 [1] [8].
4. What the sources do not provide — limits to cross-system comparisons
Available sources do not offer a systematic, side‑by‑side, age‑adjusted death-rate comparison between ICE detention, local jails, state prisons and the federal BOP using a common denominator (person‑years or deaths per 10,000). ICE’s public dashboards and death-reporting pages provide counts and procedural descriptions but do not present standardized mortality rates that would permit apples‑to‑apples comparison across U.S. detention systems in the provided reporting [6] [9]. Therefore any definitive statement that ICE’s death rate is higher or lower than other systems is not supported by the current set of documents.
5. Different systems, different drivers — why direct comparisons are tricky
Prisons, jails, immigration detention and federal detention centers operate under different authorities, patient mixes and average lengths of stay. The sources stress overcrowding, inadequate medical staffing, mental‑health deficits and rapid expansion as key drivers of ICE deaths in 2025 [7] [5] [4]. Those factors vary in prevalence across local jails, state prisons and the BOP, making raw-death-count comparisons misleading without demographic and exposure adjustments — a limitation explicitly visible across the cited reporting [4] [6].
6. Competing narratives and implicit agendas in the reporting
Advocacy groups and immigrant‑rights organizations frame the story as evidence that immigration detention inherently causes preventable deaths and call for reduced detention or abolition; their reports emphasize systemic neglect and a 95% preventability rate [4] [10]. Media outlets and opinion writers highlight the political context — that detention expansions under the current administration correlate with rising fatalities and that private prison profits may create perverse incentives [1] [5]. ICE and DHS materials cited by outlets present procedural standards and supervisory structures but, in the provided reporting, do not refute claims about medical failures; official data releases focus on counts and process rather than counteranalyses [9] [6].
7. Bottom line and what credible next steps would require
Current reporting documents a clear increase in both ICE’s detained population and in the number of deaths in custody in 2025, and independent reviews find a pattern of preventable fatalities tied to medical and oversight failures [2] [1] [4]. However, available sources do not contain standardized, age‑ or risk‑adjusted mortality comparisons that would allow a rigorous statement that ICE’s death rate is definitively higher or lower than jails, prisons or BOP facilities; producing that judgment would require harmonized denominators (person‑years), cause‑of‑death breakdowns and demographic controls not present in the supplied reporting [6] [9].
If you want, I can: (a) extract the raw counts and detainee totals from ICE dashboards and media tallies here and compute provisional deaths per 10,000 for 2025 with caveats, or (b) pull together the specific data points you’d need to perform an adjusted cross‑system mortality analysis.