Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are more people being wrongfully deported with this administration that previous
Executive summary
Available reporting shows a clear increase in deportation activity under the current administration and multiple documented instances of “wrongful” removals that courts and human-rights bodies have ordered reversed or criticized (e.g., courts ordered returns of at least four people; Migration Policy Institute estimates about 340,000 ICE deportations in FY2025) [1] [2]. At the same time federal agencies and advocates dispute counting methods and claim some publicized tallies mix voluntary self-deports and other actions with formal removals, making direct comparisons to prior administrations difficult [3] [4] [5].
1. “More deportations” — what the data and agencies say
Government releases and reporting show that removals and departures accelerated in 2025: DHS has publicly touted figures such as “more than 527,000 removed” and broader totals of “removed or self-deported” that the department has used to describe millions out of the country since January [3] [6]. Independent analysts flag that DHS’s broader framing—mixing formal ICE removals with voluntary departures or returns—differs from conventional metrics and can inflate apparent year‑over‑year change [4] [5]. Migration Policy Institute’s estimate that ICE conducted roughly 340,000 deportations in FY2025 offers a more narrowly defined figure focused on ICE removals rather than the department’s aggregated counts [2].
2. Evidence of wrongful deportations — courts, UN, and press
Multiple high-profile wrongful-removal cases have been reported and in some instances courts ordered the government to facilitate returns. Reporting documents several mistaken or legally barred deportations — for example, Kilmar Armando Abrego García and others whom courts directed the government to bring back — and recent cases prompted public and judicial rebukes [7] [1]. UN human-rights experts publicly flagged concern about unlawful U.S. deportations to El Salvador, highlighting international-law obligations and criticizing lack of remedy for wrongfully deported individuals [8].
3. How “wrongful deportation” is being identified in reporting
News outlets and legal advocates use several indicators to classify a removal as wrongful: deportation despite a court order prohibiting return, deportation of people who had pending legal claims or protections (e.g., credible fear, SIV/DACA status), and removals that appear to ignore due process or documentation [9] [1] [10]. In several documented episodes the government later called some removals “inadvertent” and sought to reverse them when alerted by counsel or courts [9] [11].
4. Is the rate of wrongful deportations higher than before? — the evidentiary limits
Available sources establish a rise in overall removals and multiple confirmed wrongful cases, but they do not provide a systematic, publicly disclosed count of wrongful deportations across administrations for direct comparison [2] [5]. Analysts caution DHS data transparency has been inconsistent, and comparisons are complicated because DHS sometimes aggregates voluntary departures with removals—so claims about “more wrongful deportations than previous administrations” cannot be definitively proven from publicly released data alone [4] [5].
5. Competing narratives and motivations to watch
The administration emphasizes enforcement milestones and frames higher removal totals as restoring the rule of law [3] [12]. Critics, courts, and international bodies emphasize due-process failures, mistaken removals, and potential breaches of international obligations [8] [7]. Advocacy groups and some analysts argue the administration’s counting methods are designed to magnify political messaging about a mass‑deportation “success,” while officials counter that increased enforcement necessarily produces more operational errors when scaled up rapidly [5] [4].
6. Practical takeaway for assessing claims
To evaluate whether more people are being wrongfully deported now than under prior administrations, readers should demand (a) transparent DHS/ICE tables that separate formal “removals” from voluntary departures and other categories, (b) systematic tracking of court‑ordered returns and wrongful‑removal rulings, and (c) independent audits of high‑profile cases cited by courts or the UN [2] [4] [8]. Current reporting documents increased removals and multiple wrongful cases, but available sources do not provide a comprehensive comparative tally proving the wrongful‑deportation rate is higher than in past administrations [2] [5].
Sources cited: Migration Policy Institute reporting and estimates [2]; Time, Politico, The Guardian, Mother Jones reporting on court‑ordered returns and inadvertent deportations [1] [11] [9] [7]; DHS public claims and press releases [3] [6]; analyses and critiques of DHS counting methods (Axios, TRAC, Newsweek excerpts summarized in provided results) [4] [5] [13]; UN expert statement and legal analyses [8] [10].