Have there been confirmed cases of U.S. citizens wrongfully detained or removed by ICE in 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Independent investigations and reporting in 2025 documented dozens — and by some tallies more than 170 — instances in which U.S. citizens were detained by DHS immigration agents during enforcement actions, and several high‑profile cases and lawsuits allege extended detentions and mistreatment; at the same time, DHS publicly disputes some of the reporting and insists it does not deport U.S. citizens [1] [2] [3]. Congressional Democrats and watchdogs have demanded formal probes amid concerns about record‑keeping and racial profiling that make the full scope difficult to quantify [4].
1. What the investigative record says: dozens to 170+ documented detentions
Reporting by ProPublica and subsequent local outlets compiled more than 170 instances in 2025 where people identified as U.S. citizens were held by immigration agents during raids and enforcement operations, with some held for more than a day and allegations of physical force and denial of phone or lawyer access in multiple accounts [1] [2]. Regional coverage amplified those findings: outlets such as OPB and the Louisiana Illuminator republished and summarized ProPublica’s database and individual narratives demonstrating repeated patterns of citizen detentions in worksite and street enforcement actions [5] [6]. Law‑firm and advocacy summaries likewise cite the 170+ tally and warn that the true number could be higher because DHS does not comprehensively track citizen stops [1] [7].
2. Examples and allegations driving the conclusion
Specific cases highlighted in reporting include individuals who say they were detained despite proof of citizenship, subjected to prolonged custody, or threatened with expedited removal paperwork that appeared to resurrect decades‑old records — such as reporting that a 2004 DHS form was reissued in 2025 in one instance — and accounts of physical roughness during arrests documented in ProPublica’s reporting [8] [2]. Lawsuits and public complaints include claims that citizens were detained for days without phone contact, that agents used force or restrained elderly or disabled individuals, and that some citizens were placed into removal‑oriented custody during sweeps intended to capture undocumented people [2] [9].
3. The government response and competing claims
The Department of Homeland Security has publicly pushed back against specific news stories and asserted “DHS does NOT deport U.S. citizens,” disputing narratives that allege systemic deportations of citizens and offering alternate factual accounts of some incidents — for example, saying particular detainees were released after confirmation of citizenship or were arrested for other alleged offenses [3]. DHS statements function both as denials of systemic policy and as case‑by‑case corrections, but they do not appear to offer a centralized count of citizen encounters; that gap has fueled skepticism from lawmakers and reporters [3] [4].
4. Congressional oversight, record‑keeping gaps, and political framing
Members of Congress from both chambers have demanded investigations into the pattern, asking DHS for lists of citizens detained over 24 hours and details about training and database practices; lawmakers argue that ICE’s patchy record‑keeping and the expansion of expedited removal increase the risk of citizens being wrongly swept up [4] [9]. Critics say the Trump administration’s aggressive enforcement priorities and faster‑paced operations create incentives for reliance on imperfect biometric or biographic checks that can misidentify citizens, while defenders point to law‑enforcement realities and isolated missteps rather than a policy to detain citizens [4] [10].
5. How to read the evidence and remaining uncertainties
The investigative record establishes confirmed instances in 2025 of U.S. citizens being detained by immigration agents, including multiple cases that led to lawsuits and congressional inquiries; however, the exact universe of such cases remains uncertain because DHS does not produce a definitive, transparent tally and disputes some characterizations in the press [1] [3] [4]. Independent reporters and legal advocates argue the documented numbers and severity of several incidents are sufficient to treat the problem as systemic and to justify oversight; DHS and some law‑enforcement spokespeople contend that errors are exceptions and emphasize that citizens are supposed to be released when status is confirmed [2] [3].