Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: How do constitutional protections apply to non-citizens in ICE custody?

Checked on June 14, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Constitutional protections DO apply to non-citizens in ICE custody, with several key rights being consistently emphasized across sources:

  • First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment protections apply regardless of immigration status [1]
  • The right to remain silent and protection against self-incrimination [2]
  • Due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments [3]
  • Protection against unreasonable searches [1]
  • The right to challenge deportation in immigration court [1]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important nuances were not addressed in the original question:

  • The Constitution generally phrases rights as limitations on government power rather than protections specific to citizens [4]
  • Green card holders have rights "akin to American citizens," suggesting a tiered system of protections [2]
  • The "plenary power" doctrine gives the federal government broader immigration enforcement powers, creating some limitations to these protections [4]
  • ICE detainer practices may be potentially unconstitutional when conducted without judicial oversight [5]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question might suggest uncertainty about whether constitutional protections apply to non-citizens, when in fact this is well-established law. Multiple sources emphasize that:

  • Constitutional protections apply to "all persons" or "every person," not just citizens [5]
  • Rights are based on personhood, not citizenship [6]
  • As stated by lawyer Raha Wala: "no matter who you are or where you're born, what your immigration status is, you do have constitutional rights here in the United States" [2]

This clarity is important because:

  • Immigration advocacy groups benefit from emphasizing these protections to protect immigrant rights
  • Law enforcement agencies might benefit from downplaying these protections to maintain broader enforcement powers
  • Legal professionals and civil rights organizations have a vested interest in ensuring these constitutional protections are understood and upheld
Want to dive deeper?
What due process rights do undocumented immigrants have in immigration detention?
How does the Fourth Amendment apply to ICE searches and seizures of non-citizens?
Can non-citizens in ICE custody access legal representation and habeas corpus?
What are the conditions and standards for immigration detention facilities?
How do international human rights laws intersect with U.S. immigration detention?