Which court filings or dockets quote Leavitt’s alleged comments about Coco Gauff?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The available reporting shows no verifiable court filing or docket that quotes Karoline Leavitt’s alleged comments about Coco Gauff; the purported $50 million lawsuits and quoted remarks appear in fabricated viral stories on fringe sites, not in any public court record identified by fact-checkers [1] [2]. Multiple viral articles and rewrites claim specific language from lawsuits, but those pieces cite no official dockets and were flagged as misinformation by outlets that searched court databases and found nothing [3] [2] [1].
1. The claim being circulated and its specifics
Sensational headlines claimed Coco Gauff (and in other variants John Legend or other celebrities) filed $50 million lawsuits against Karoline Leavitt and a network, and those articles attributed direct quotes to the lawsuits and to on-air exchanges with Leavitt—phrases like “You can try to tear me down” and dramatic descriptions of a live ambush were published repeatedly across fringe outlets [4] [3] [2].
2. Which outlets published alleged quotes from filings
Sites such as sport.feji.io, All For Today and AllPlayNews ran stories asserting that a $50 million complaint had been filed and included alleged quoted passages from those complaints or the on-air encounter, repeating specific lines and legal characterizations like defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and racial harassment [2] [4] [3].
3. What searches of court records and fact-checkers found
Investigations by fact-checking outlets and legal researchers found no corresponding docket entries, no filed complaints in state or federal court databases, and no verified court documents containing the quoted language; one summary explicitly states “no court filings exist” and that searches across U.S. court databases returned nothing supporting the claims [1].
4. Discrepancy between viral reporting and verifiable documents
While the viral articles present quoted text as coming from lawsuits or on-air transcripts, the reporting that scrutinized the claims notes that the stories provided no links to official court dockets or scanned filings and that major mainstream outlets did not corroborate the lawsuits—an important red flag given how quickly genuine celebrity lawsuits are normally covered by established media [2] [1].
5. How the quoted lines functioned in the misinformation cycle
The allegedly quoted lines—both the courtroom-asserted legal language and the dramatic media-exchange sentences—appear to have been fabricated or recycled across multiple sensational pages to amplify engagement, with identical or similar quotes resurfacing in different permutations of the story about different public figures, which fact-checkers flagged as a coordinated misinformation pattern [2] [5].
6. Alternative possibility and limits of available sources
If an authentic filing quoting Leavitt’s comments existed, it would produce a docket entry or a scanned complaint accessible through public court databases; the sources provided report that such searches found none, but these sources do not reproduce exhaustive search logs for every court in the United States, so reporting is limited to the searches described in the fact-checks and the absence of coverage in major outlets [1] [2].
7. Bottom line for readers and researchers
Based on the supplied reporting, there are no verified court filings or dockets that quote Karoline Leavitt’s alleged comments about Coco Gauff; the quoted language appears only in unverified, sensational web posts and has been debunked by reviewers who searched court records and found no supporting documents [1] [3] [2].