Which criminal cases against Donald Trump resulted in convictions or guilty pleas for others in his organizations?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Three strands of reporting show that people close to Donald Trump have pleaded guilty or been convicted in connection with matters tied to him: Michael Cohen’s 2018 guilty plea over campaign‑finance‑related payments, Allen Weisselberg’s later guilty plea tied to Trump Organization matters, and a set of co‑defendants in the Georgia election‑interference saga who accepted plea deals; public records and major news outlets make these facts clear, though reporting differs on scope and motive [1] [2] [3].
1. Michael Cohen: the central cooperating witness who pleaded guilty
Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal lawyer, pleaded guilty in 2018 to multiple counts relating to hush‑money payments and other campaign‑finance matters; in his guilty plea and subsequent testimony he admitted acting “at the direction of a candidate for federal office,” tying his criminal admissions directly to payments associated with the 2016 campaign [1] [4]. Cohen’s eight‑count federal guilty plea and three‑year sentence were widely reported and later became central evidence in the Manhattan prosecution and public investigations of the hush‑money scheme [1] [5].
2. Allen Weisselberg and Trump Organization prosecutions: guilty pleas and penalties
Reporting indicates that Allen Weisselberg, longtime Trump Organization chief financial officer, pleaded guilty to criminal charges connected with the organization and later faced perjury allegations; outlets reporting on the civil and criminal cases against the Trump Organization note Weisselberg’s plea and cooperation as a prosecutorial linchpin in building cases about corporate reimbursement practices and falsified records [2] [5]. State civil actions also produced heavy penalties and findings against the Trump Organization and some executives — penalties that reporters link to the same set of financial practices at issue in criminal probes, though civil remedies and criminal pleas are distinct legal outcomes [2].
3. Georgia case: some co‑defendants accepted plea deals while Trump did not
In the Georgia election‑interference investigation, multiple co‑defendants resolved their matters by pleading guilty or reaching plea agreements while the principal defendants, including Trump, initially pleaded not guilty; specifically, four co‑defendants accepted plea deals under the prosecutor who later paused or dropped parts of the case, according to reporting on the transition in Fulton County prosecution [3]. That split — guilty pleas by some associates and not‑guilty stances by others — has been a recurring pattern across different matters and has shaped prosecutorial strategy and political messaging [3].
4. What counts as “others in his organizations”: limits and contested narratives
News coverage and public records document convictions and pleas by named individuals tied to Trump, but the reporting does not support an exhaustive list of every employee or affiliate who has ever pleaded guilty; major sources emphasize Cohen and Weisselberg and note several co‑defendant pleas in Georgia, while civil penalties and sanctions have hit other executives and the organization itself [1] [2] [3]. Some outlets and commentators frame these pleas as evidence of systemic wrongdoing, while Trump’s defenders and some court rulings have pushed back, arguing political targeting or procedural overreach — an interpretive split that aligns with the partisan and legal stakes present in the coverage [2] [6].
5. The prosecutorial picture and the political context
Prosecutors used cooperating pleas and convictions to support larger cases — Cohen’s admissions were used as key testimony in New York proceedings, Weisselberg’s cooperation fed deeper inquiries into corporate practices, and Georgia pleas pared the field of potential trial participants — but political consequences and appellate developments have also reshaped outcomes, including dropped charges, civil appeals, and sentence mitigation tied to broader legal maneuvers and presidential considerations [1] [7] [8]. Reporting underscores that while individual guilty pleas and convictions exist, their legal and political significance remains contested and subject to further appeals, civil rulings, and prosecutorial discretion [5] [7].