Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: What is the status of Danny Masterson's appeal?

Checked on February 26, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Danny Masterson is currently appealing his 2023 rape convictions that led to a 30-years-to-life prison sentence [1]. His lawyer, Cliff Gardner, filed a 246-page appellant's opening brief on December 18, 2024 [1]. The appeal focuses on two main arguments:

  • Erroneous judicial rulings that unfairly influenced the jury's perspective
  • Significant exculpatory evidence that wasn't presented to the jury [1] [2]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements were not mentioned in the original question:

  • The original conviction was specifically for forcibly raping two women between 2001 and 2003 [2]
  • The appeal includes multiple specific challenges, including:
  • Questioning the statute of limitations application
  • Challenging the testimony of three Jane Doe victims
  • Contesting Detective Myape's testimony
  • Claims of religious discrimination regarding Scientology-related evidence [3]
  • Masterson maintains that the sexual encounters were consensual, and his defense emphasizes there was no physical evidence supporting the prosecution's case [2]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question's simplicity could lead to misconceptions about the appeal's complexity. Important considerations include:

  • While the appeal is professionally crafted, legal experts suggest it may not fully succeed in overturning the conviction [3] [3]
  • The defense strategy is broader than just this appeal - it will include a future Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [1]
  • There are documented issues with evidence preservation and changes in victim testimony over time [2]
  • The appeal could potentially result in a retrial if procedural errors are found, rather than complete exoneration [3]
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?