Is there a database of doxxed ICE agents?
Executive summary
A public, crowd‑facing website called “ICE List” has been reporting the personal details of thousands of people identified as ICE, Border Patrol and DHS employees after a purported internal leak; the site’s founder says the dataset contains roughly 4,500 records including names, contact details and employment history, though early tallies and categories vary across reporting [1] [2] [3]. The site has been repeatedly targeted and temporarily taken offline by distributed denial‑of‑service attacks, is reportedly hosted outside U.S. jurisdiction, and DHS officials have condemned the publication and warned of prosecution while stressing threats to officers [4] [5] [6].
1. The database exists — what it is and who runs it
The online repository known as ICE List is a self‑described “accountability initiative” created to publish identities and career details of ICE, Border Patrol and other DHS staff; its founder, Dominick Skinner, has told outlets the site hosts names, work emails, phone numbers and résumé data and is managed by a small team using automated tools to verify entries [1] [7]. Skinner said a Department of Homeland Security employee provided the data after the killing of Renee Nicole Good, and he has described the material as including thousands of records — figures reported as roughly 4,500 in aggregate, with other breakdowns noting about 1,800–2,000 frontline agents and additional supervisors and support staff [1] [2] [8].
2. Scope, verification and technical status — the limits of the public list
Reporting shows the list has been presented as both a static leak and a crowd‑augmented database where site users can contribute photographs, incident descriptions and employment history, and the founder says AI tools assist verification, but independent verification of every entry has not been documented in the sources provided [3] [7]. Security reporting also notes that the site has been hit by a “prolonged and sophisticated” DDoS that intermittently took it offline and made immediate, comprehensive review difficult, and Wikipedia and others report the hosting is in the Netherlands — a technical fact that complicates U.S. takedown efforts [4] [5].
3. Official reaction and legal framing
DHS and ICE officials have labeled the publication dangerous, saying doxxing endangers officers and their families and pledging prosecution of those responsible; Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin publicly condemned the leak and warned of criminal exposure for anyone who disseminates the data [3] [5] [6]. Legislative responses and proposed bills aiming to restrict or criminalize doxxing of law enforcement have been reported amid the controversy, reflecting a policy push to shield agents from disclosure [7].
4. Conflicting narratives and the whistleblower claim
Media coverage is consistent that a DHS employee is alleged to have provided the data, and Skinner frames the leak as motivated by internal dissent over enforcement actions — but that account largely rests on his statements to outlets like the Daily Beast and secondary reporting, and the precise provenance, chain of custody and the whistleblower’s identity are not independently corroborated in the pieces reviewed [1] [8]. Critics argue that publishing personal details of federal employees traffics in vigilantism and risks violence, while advocates of the site cast it as an accountability tool for agents often operating covertly; both positions appear across the reporting [2] [7].
5. What can’t be established from reporting so far
None of the provided sources establish a fully authenticated, publicly auditable master list that can be independently verified by third‑party journalists or government auditors; figures vary between outlets (about 4,500 total versus narrower counts of frontline agents and supervisors) and the intermittent outages and foreign hosting limit researcher access, meaning claims about comprehensiveness, accuracy and the exact mix of active versus former employees remain unverified in these sources [1] [4] [5].
6. Bottom line
Yes — multiple outlets report an active online database called ICE List that has published thousands of alleged ICE, Border Patrol and DHS names and related personal and employment data following a claimed internal leak, but the scope, accuracy and legal status of that compilation remain contested and technically unstable as reported, and the provenance of the data beyond the founder’s account has not been independently proven in the available reporting [3] [1] [4].