What evidence and testimony led to David Gentile’s conviction and who were co-defendants?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Federal prosecutors said David Gentile and co-defendant Jeffry Schneider ran a multi‑year scheme that raised about $1.6 billion from more than 10,000 mostly retail investors and used new investor money to pay distributions and conceal poor fund performance; a jury convicted Gentile in August 2024 on securities‑ and wire‑fraud counts after an eight‑week trial and he was sentenced to seven years in May 2025 [1] [2] [3]. The government’s case relied on internal emails, accounting documents showing funds paid out more than they earned, testimony from former employees and thousands of victim statements; defendants challenged witness credibility and said the government failed to tie specific fraudulent representations to Gentile [4] [1] [5].
1. The criminal core: what jurors were asked to believe
Prosecutors told jurors that GPB Capital raised roughly $1.6 billion from individual investors for private equity funds, then misrepresented portfolio returns and the source of monthly distributions, using new investor capital to create the appearance of success — a practice prosecutors likened to a Ponzi‑style funding of distributions — and produced internal records showing funds paid out more than they earned [1] [6] [4]. The Eastern District of New York stated the scheme “wove a web of lies” and pointed to accounting and management dashboards documenting shortfalls in coverage ratios for several funds that were circulated among senior GPB staff [1] [4].
2. Documentary evidence cited at trial
The government introduced emails, management dashboards and audited statements indicating that Automotive Portfolio and other funds had paid out millions more than they had earned over multiple months; a prosecutorial filing and grand‑jury exhibits cited specific coverage ratios and transfers between fund accounts that illustrated the cash‑flow problems the government says the defendants concealed [4] [1]. Regulators’ complaints and audits later noted corporate spending that benefited executives, such as private jet costs and a Ferrari, which federal and state filings used to show misuse of investor funds [7].
3. Witness testimony the government emphasized
Prosecutors relied on testimony from former GPB employees and other insiders who described how distributions were sustained with new investor capital, and the jury heard from witnesses who documented internal discussions about coverage ratios and proposals to move money between accounts to cover shortfalls [4] [1]. The trial lasted eight weeks, producing more than 1,000 victim impact statements submitted to the court, which prosecutors cited to show the scheme’s breadth and harm [8] [2].
4. Defense themes and contested testimony
Defense lawyers attacked the credibility of key witnesses — including former GPB staff — and told the jury the government had not tied specific allegedly fraudulent statements directly to Gentile; defense counsel argued that broker‑dealers were told the funds were struggling and that some testimony was false or uncorrected, a contention referenced in press coverage [9] [5]. NBC News summarized those defense contentions, noting claims that the government “was unable to tie any supposedly fraudulent representations to Mr. Gentile” and that his team raised “serious concerns” about elicited testimony [5].
5. The verdicts, sentences and co‑defendants
A federal jury convicted David Gentile and his business partner Jeffry Schneider in August 2024: Gentile was convicted of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, securities fraud and two counts of wire fraud; Schneider was convicted on related conspiracies and securities‑fraud counts [2] [10]. Judge Rachel P. Kovner sentenced Gentile to seven years and Schneider to six years in May 2025; prosecutors sought forfeiture and restitution amounts [1] [10] [3].
6. Aftermath and differing framings of the case
Coverage since the conviction has sharply diverged: news outlets and the Justice Department framed the trial as exposing a broad fraud that victimized thousands and justified criminal penalties [1] [6], while Gentile’s defense and some reporting pointed to alleged evidentiary gaps and witness credibility problems that they say undermined the case against him [5] [9]. President Trump later commuted Gentile’s sentence and removed a $15.5 million restitution obligation, a clemency decision that renewed scrutiny of both the prosecution’s work and the victims’ demands for accountability [3] [6].
Limitations and sourcing note: this analysis relies solely on the assembled reporting and official filings provided; available sources do not mention whether other co‑defendants beyond Jeffry Schneider were tried alongside Gentile, nor do they enumerate every witness or exhibit introduced at trial [1] [4].