Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Has DC had a murder in last 30 days?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the available analyses, DC has experienced murders within the last 30 days, but not in the most recent period. The evidence shows that there have been two murders in DC since President Trump signed his executive order taking control of the Metropolitan Police Department, with none occurring since August 13, 2025 [1]. This means DC has marked 12 consecutive days without a homicide as of the reporting date [2].
The broader context reveals that DC recorded 101 homicides as of August 21, 2025 [3], indicating ongoing criminal activity throughout the year. However, the city has experienced a significant decline in homicides, falling 34% compared to 2023 through July 2025 [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks important temporal context about DC's recent crime trends. Crime in Washington has declined significantly since a spike in 2023, with the city recording 187 murders in 2024 and a continued decline in 2025 [5] [4]. This downward trend provides crucial context that the simple yes/no question doesn't capture.
The analyses reveal competing narratives about DC crime statistics. Trump and city leaders offer competing claims about crime rates [6], with Trump claiming Washington's murder rate is higher than Bogotá or Mexico City [4]. City officials and law enforcement agencies benefit from demonstrating crime reduction success, while political figures like Trump may benefit from portraying DC as dangerous to justify federal intervention.
The deployment of National Guard troops to DC in response to crime represents a significant policy response that affects how crime statistics are interpreted and reported [6]. Trump's DC takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department creates a political dimension to crime reporting that wasn't present in previous periods [1].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question, while factually answerable, presents potential for misleading interpretation. Crime trends can be misleading and different time frames can tell different stories [5]. A simple yes/no answer about murders in the last 30 days could be used to support various political narratives without acknowledging the broader context of declining crime rates.
The question's timing coincides with heightened political attention to DC crime statistics, where different stakeholders have incentives to emphasize different aspects of the data. The recent 12-day homicide-free period [2] could be highlighted by those supporting current policies, while the fact that murders did occur earlier in the 30-day period could be emphasized by critics seeking to demonstrate ongoing problems.
The framing also ignores the significant year-over-year improvements in DC's homicide rate, which provides important context for understanding whether recent murders represent typical patterns or concerning trends [5] [4].