Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Has the Department of Homeland Security reported U.S. citizen deportations since January 2025?
Executive Summary
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has publicly asserted that U.S. citizens are not subject to deportation and that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) does not arrest or deport citizens; DHS formal rebuttals and press releases reflect that position [1] [2]. Independent investigations and reporting compiled by outlets such as ProPublica document more than 170 instances since January 2025 where U.S. citizens were detained by immigration agents, often temporarily and sometimes under disputed circumstances, and note that DHS does not centrally track citizen detentions [3]. The record therefore shows a clash between DHS institutional statements denying citizen deportations and independent reporting documenting multiple alleged citizen detentions and related harms, with important differences in definitions, scope, and data collection practices that shape each side’s claims [3] [1].
1. Big Picture: DHS’s Public Position and Official Records That Emphasize Non-Citizen Removals
DHS press releases in 2025 emphasize the agency’s removal of noncitizens and explicitly deny a policy or practice of deporting U.S. citizens, including a targeted rebuttal to reporting that alleged citizen deportations; DHS reiterated ICE does not arrest or deport U.S. citizens in an October 1, 2025 statement and detailed its removals of illegal aliens in other releases [1] [2]. These DHS documents focus on aggregate enforcement numbers—millions reported as removed or self-deported and hundreds of thousands formally deported—and frame enforcement success around noncitizen removals, not citizen expulsions [4] [2]. DHS also attributes arrests of citizens encountered during operations to criminal conduct like obstruction, rather than immigration status, and notes its internal procedures for status verification when questions arise [1]. The official record therefore presents a clear doctrinal boundary: formal deportation applies to noncitizens, and DHS states it does not expel citizens.
2. The Independent Count: ProPublica’s Compilation of Citizen Detentions and What It Found
ProPublica’s October 16, 2025 investigation assembled more than 170 cases of U.S. citizens detained by immigration agents since January 2025, using lawsuits, court records, local reporting, and social media to build its count; the reporting documents instances where citizens—many Latino—were held for hours or longer, some without counsel or timely release, and includes vulnerable cases such as children and ill family members [3]. ProPublica stresses that DHS does not maintain a central tracking system for citizen detentions, which compelled reporters to compile a de facto count and note patterns of misidentification, racialized enforcement practices, and harm to individuals who later proved citizenship [3]. This reportage does not generally claim mass formal deportations of citizens; rather, it documents detention and temporary deprivation of liberty by immigration agents and asserts those events occurred repeatedly enough to merit scrutiny [3].
3. Places Where Reports Diverge: Definitions, Data Gaps, and What “Deportation” Means
The core divergence in the record is definitional and evidentiary: DHS focuses on formal removal (a legal deportation process reserved for noncitizens) and insists it does not deport citizens, while independent reporting documents detention events and, in some contested accounts, instances where citizens were carried across borders or turned over—claims that are harder to substantiate at scale without centralized data [1] [3]. DHS’s refusal to track citizen detentions centrally creates a data gap that allows investigative outlets to compile case series using disparate sources, producing credible compilations but not the kind of systematic administrative accounting DHS releases for noncitizen removals [3]. The dispute is therefore partly about whether reported detentions constitute formal deportations, and partly about whether DHS’s public records capture all enforcement harms involving citizens.
4. Additional Reporting and Context: Detention System Growth and Legal Challenges
Broader reporting and academic analysis document the rapid expansion of U.S. immigrant detention capacity and enforcement activity in 2025, which heightens the risk of misidentification and wrongful detention as operations scale up [5]. Lawsuits and local media accounts included in compilations cite examples of Americans who were detained and later released or who sought redress; human consequences—medical emergencies, family separation, legal costs—appear repeatedly in independent reporting and litigation reporting [3] [6]. These materials show systemic pressure points—large sweeps, private detention contractors, and limited oversight—that plausibly produce mistaken detentions even absent a formal policy to deport citizens, underscoring why investigative counts and DHS denials can both be factually accurate within their frameworks.
5. Bottom Line: What the Record Actually Supports and Remaining Unanswered Questions
The record supports two simultaneous facts: DHS maintains and publicly states a policy that it does not arrest or deport U.S. citizens and publishes aggregate noncitizen removal data; independent investigations have documented dozens to hundreds of cases in which U.S. citizens were detained by immigration agents since January 2025, sometimes under circumstances that raise due-process and civil‑rights concerns [1] [3]. What remains unresolved at scale is whether any of those documented detentions equal formal deportations in DHS administrative records, how frequently status-verification failures lead to cross‑border removals of citizens, and why DHS lacks centralized tracking of citizen detentions—the key data gaps that prevent a single, definitive accounting [3].