Did ICE deport 10 year old cancer patient
Executive summary
Reporting from multiple outlets shows that U.S. immigration authorities removed at least one 10-year-old American girl with brain cancer from the United States and sent her to Mexico in March 2025, and separately that ICE deported three U.S. citizen children — including a child with metastatic cancer — to Honduras in April 2025; advocates and lawyers say the families were denied meaningful choice or access to medical care, while DHS/ICE have disputed characterizations of the removals [1][2][3][4].
1. What the reporting actually says about a 10‑year‑old cancer patient being removed
Multiple news organizations first reported that a 10‑year‑old U.S. citizen girl who was receiving treatment for brain cancer was detained while traveling from Clint, Texas, to Houston for care and was later removed to Mexico along with her parents and siblings, with outlets explicitly identifying her as 10 years old and as a pediatric cancer patient [1][2][4].
2. Separate but related incident: U.S. citizen children deported to Honduras, one with metastatic cancer
In a distinct case in late April 2025, the ACLU and other advocates said ICE deported two mothers and three U.S. citizen children (ages reported as 2, 4 and 7) to Honduras, and that one of those children — described in filings and press releases as a young boy — has a rare, late‑stage metastatic cancer and was allegedly removed without medication or consultation with treating physicians [3][5][6].
3. Claims, counterclaims, and the legal posture
Attorneys and advocacy groups filed complaints and a habeas petition asserting the families were held “incommunicado,” denied meaningful opportunity to arrange caretakers, and rushed onto deportation flights despite ICE instructions that require coordination for minors’ care; the ACLU and other organizations have said government attorneys assured counsel calls would be arranged but then deportations occurred before courts reopened [3][7][8]. The Department of Homeland Security and ICE publicly pushed back in some cases, saying U.S. children are not being “deported” and disputing that parents lacked choice — a claim attorneys for the families call misleading given their clients’ testimonies [4][9][7].
4. What’s corroborated, and what remains uncertain
Contemporary reporting from NBC, Today, Houston Public Media and other outlets documents at least one removal of a 10‑year‑old American receiving brain‑cancer treatment to Mexico and the April removals to Honduras including a child with metastatic cancer; those journalistic and advocacy accounts are the basis for the factual assertions here [4][1][3][5]. Public sources include court filings, ACLU press releases and contemporaneous news stories; however, full government records, medical records, and complete court rulings are not publicly included in these reports, and this analysis does not assert facts beyond what those sources report [3][10].
5. Competing narratives and possible motives behind them
Advocates frame these incidents as evidence of systemic violations of due process and child welfare rules, arguing ICE ignored its own directives and deliberately isolated families to prevent legal intervention [3][5]. Government statements — including DHS denials that children are being “deported” — reflect an institutional interest in minimizing political blowback and legal liability; attorneys for the families, meanwhile, describe coercion and lack of access to counsel, a claim amplified by outlets such as NBC, The Guardian and PBS that cite the parents’ lawyers [4][9][8].
6. Bottom line answer
Yes: reputable reporting documents at least one case in which a 10‑year‑old U.S. citizen receiving brain cancer treatment was removed from the United States to Mexico while traveling with her parents, and separately documents ICE removals to Honduras that included a U.S. citizen child with metastatic cancer; advocacy groups allege the removals occurred without proper medical coordination or meaningful parent choice, while DHS/ICE have disputed some characterizations — the fuller facts remain tied to ongoing legal actions and government records not fully reproduced in news reports [1][2][3][4].