Did ICE leave a baby in a car

1. What reporters say happened that night: a trapped family, flash-bangs and tear gas

Local and national outlets describe Shawn and Destiny Jackson driving home with six children when they became stuck between protesters and federal agents; the family says flash‑bangs detonated nearby and a tear‑gas canister rolled under or near the vehicle, creating a cloud that filled the SUV ^{[2] [1] [3]}. Multiple outlets report the parents say the 6‑month‑old stopped breathing and the mother performed CPR while bystanders assisted, and that three children were taken to hospital, including the infant ^{[2] [6] [7]}.

2. Family testimony and corroborating video/transcripts in the press

The Jacksons’ account—that agents ordered them out, that munitions detonated around and under their car, and that the infant lost consciousness—was reported by CNN, The New York Times, CBS Minnesota, Fox9 and others citing interviews, video and 911 or incident materials ^{[3] [1] [2] [6]}. Those pieces consistently recount the mother describing mouth‑to‑mouth resuscitation and a brief loss of consciousness, and they report the family and neighbors moved the baby into a nearby home before ambulance transport ^{[2] [5] [8]}.

3. What federal authorities have said and what they have not said

Department of Homeland Security statements quoted in local coverage acknowledged reports that the infant had stopped breathing and noted the family moved the baby into a nearby home, while DHS has also said it did not target the Jackson family specifically ^{[5] [4]}. No provided source contains a DHS admission that agents intentionally left any child inside the vehicle; similarly, no source advances verified surveillance or internal agency records showing an agent abandoned an infant in the car ^{[4] [5]}.

4. How the mainstream coverage frames responsibility and gaps in the record

Major outlets focus on the family’s allegation that federal crowd‑control munitions endangered children and on municipal tensions after an unrelated ICE shooting; investigative and advocacy outlets connect this incident to a pattern of harmful munitions use near children ^{[9] [10]}. However, the record in these reports is primarily the family’s testimony, bystander video, and official statements denying targeted action—none of the stories published in the provided corpus shows incontrovertible proof of intentional abandonment of the infant in the vehicle ^{[1] [3] [4]}.

5. Stakes, motivations and why narratives diverge

Advocacy outlets and some local reporting emphasize systemic harm from ICE’s use of chemical agents around communities and schools, which frames the Jacksons’ experience as part of a pattern ^{[9] [11]}. Federal sources and some officials emphasize law‑enforcement context and deny targeted intent, reflecting institutional interests in minimizing culpability. The available sources therefore leave room for competing narratives: the family’s traumatized firsthand account and broader critiques of crowd‑control tactics versus the government’s narrower operational framing ^{[10] [4]}.

6. Bottom line — did ICE "leave a baby in a car"?

Based on the reporting provided, there is no verified evidence that ICE intentionally left a baby inside a car; the Jacksons and multiple news outlets report the infant was enveloped by deployed munitions, became unconscious, was removed from the vehicle by the mother and bystanders, received CPR, and was transported to a hospital ^{[2] [1] [6] [5]}. The incident is widely reported as a dangerous exposure caused by munitions used near the vehicle, but not as an instance where agents knowingly abandoned a child inside the car; available official statements deny targeting the family and confirm the infant was moved and treated ^{[4] [5]}. If definitive internal documentation or body‑cam footage exists that directly contradicts or confirms either claim, it was not included in the reporting provided here, and that gap limits conclusive assignment of intent.