Did Minnesota police arrest ICE AGENT

1. What the record actually shows: shootings, lawsuits and protests — not a local arrest of an ICE officer

The dominant facts in the reporting are that federal immigration agents have been involved in several deadly and controversial uses of force in Minneapolis — including the fatal shootings of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti — and that these events have sparked mass protests, lawsuits and political blowback ^{[6] [1] [7]}. News outlets describe strained cooperation between federal and state investigators and note that federal authorities have at times blocked local access to scenes and investigations, fueling accusations of a cover-up rather than reports that local police took an ICE agent into custody ^{[3] [8]}.

2. Where the question might come from: confusion between arrests of protesters and arrests by ICE

The coverage records many arrests tied to the disruption and protests — demonstrators, clergy, and others were detained during demonstrations, and federal agencies report a high number of immigration arrests as part of Operation Metro Surge ^{[4] [6] [9]}. That torrent of arrests, plus viral footage of scuffles between protesters and ICE, creates an impression of reciprocal detentions, but the sources distinguish arrests made by federal agents from actions by local police; none of the supplied reporting documents Minneapolis police arresting an ICE agent ^{[9] [4]}.

3. Accountability and jurisdiction: why local arrest of a federal agent would be complicated

Multiple outlets emphasize legal and jurisdictional friction: federal agents often operate under Homeland Security, federal investigations can preempt local probes, and federal civil‑rights inquiries have been described as constrained or blocked, limiting state-level charging decisions ^{[3] [5]}. That context helps explain why reporting contains detailed disputes over investigations and prosecutions but no confirmed instance in the supplied sources of Minnesota police arresting an ICE agent themselves ^{[3] [5]}.

4. Alternative narratives and motivations in the coverage

Right-leaning outlets and DHS statements emphasize arrests of people the administration calls violent criminals and portray the surge as law‑and‑order enforcement, while civil liberties groups and local officials frame the operation as politically motivated, heavy‑handed and sometimes unlawful ^{[10] [4] [7]}. These competing framings create incentive structures for portraying events either as justified federal action or as abusive occupation — a dynamic that can breed misinformation or conflation of who arrested whom, but the sources provided do not substantiate a claim that Minneapolis police arrested an ICE agent ^{[10] [7]}.

5. What is not in the reporting and the limits of this answer

The assembled sources make clear there were many chaotic confrontations, mutual accusations and litigation — and they document federal agents detaining civilians and federal internal reviews — yet none of the material given here reports a Minnesota police arrest of an ICE agent, nor do these sources provide a contemporaneous police booking or charge statement against an ICE officer ^{[1] [3] [9]}. If a local arrest of a federal officer occurred, it is not reflected in the reporting supplied for this analysis.

6. Bottom line: based on the provided reporting, the answer is no

Given the documents cited — Reuters, The Guardian, local government releases, MPR and other outlets — there is no evidence in these materials that Minnesota police arrested an ICE agent; the narrative in the sources is instead one of federal agents conducting arrests and shootings, state‑federal investigation disputes, and local legal challenges ^{[1] [3] [4]}.