Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Do homosexuals commit sex crimes at higher rates

Checked on November 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Research does not support a simple claim that "homosexuals" commit sex crimes at higher rates; large recent studies show LGBT people are much more often victims of violent and sexual crimes than non‑LGBT people (e.g., 71.1 vs. 19.2 victimizations per 1,000 in 2017 NCVS analysis) [1] [2]. Older, smaller and methodologically varied studies offer mixed findings about perpetration by sexual orientation and sometimes conflate distinct groups (gay men, lesbians, bisexuals, transgender people) and different offense types, so blanket statements about “homosexuals” are unsupported in the available reporting [3] [4] [5].

1. What the best population data show: LGBT people are disproportionately victims

National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) analyses and Bureau of Justice Statistics reports consistently find LGBT people experience far higher rates of violent and sexual victimization than non‑LGBT people — for example, the 2017 NCVS-based Science Advances/Williams Institute reporting shows 71.1 victimizations per 1,000 for LGBT people vs. 19.2 per 1,000 for non‑LGBT people [1] [2], and BJS reported lesbian/gay victimization at 43.5 per 1,000 vs. 19.0 per 1,000 for straight persons in 2017–2020 aggregated data [6]. Recent pooled NCVS work through 2022–2023 found similarly elevated victimization (106.4 vs. 21.1 per 1,000) [7].

2. Perpetration: the evidence is mixed, limited, and varies by subgroup and offense

Studies that examine offending by sexual orientation use different samples, time periods and measures. Some older or smaller studies found heterosexual men more criminal/violent than gay men while bisexuals or lesbians sometimes showed higher rates on certain measures [3] [4]. A recent total‑population study in the Netherlands addresses population differences but points to complexities (different gender patterns, testosterone/cross‑gender shift hypotheses) rather than a uniform higher offending rate among gay men [5]. Overall, available sources do not demonstrate a clear, consistent pattern that homosexual people commit sex crimes at higher rates across contexts; findings differ by sex, orientation subgroup, and crime type [3] [5] [4].

3. Why headlines and claims often mislead: sampling, definitions, and conflation

Reporting that “homosexuals” commit more sex crimes often rests on studies with limited samples (clinic or convenience samples), narrow definitions of crimes, or data that aggregate disparate groups (gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender) or confuse prevalence with absolute counts where heterosexuals are numerically larger [8] [3]. Some older or advocacy‑driven articles cite flawed extrapolations—these sources are present in the record [8], but broader population surveys and government victimization data provide a more reliable baseline [1] [6].

4. The victim–perpetrator overlap and system biases matter

Scholars and criminal‑justice organizations note the "line between victim and perpetrator is often blurry": people who have experienced victimization and trauma are overrepresented among those who later have contact with the criminal system, and LGBTQ+ people face discrimination at every stage from arrest to incarceration [9] [10]. The higher arrest and incarceration rates for LGBTQ+ individuals reported by some researchers may reflect structural disadvantages (poverty, homelessness, discriminatory policing and court practices) rather than higher intrinsic offending rates [9].

5. Sexual offending against minors: contested claims and reporting limitations

Some older, often-cited reports claim much higher rates of male‑child sexual abuse by gay men; these claims (and media stories quoting them) are criticized for methodological problems and selective use of data [8]. The more rigorous national surveys and BJS/NCVS outputs primarily track victimization experiences and do not support a simple causal linkage that sexual orientation predicts higher rates of sex offending in the population; available sources do not provide definitive, unbiased national perpetration rates broken down by sexual orientation for sex crimes [1] [6]. If you are asking about child sexual abuse specifically, the reporting in the supplied sources is mixed and limited [8] [1].

6. What responsible reporting requires: disaggregation and context

Researchers and journalists emphasize disaggregating sexual orientation and gender identity (gay men vs. lesbians vs. bisexual vs. transgender) and separating types of crime (intimate partner violence, sexual assault, hate crimes, property crime) rather than using the catchall “homosexuals.” NCVS‑based studies and BJS reports are the strongest current sources for victimization rates and show elevated risk for LGBT groups [1] [6] [7]. Studies of perpetration require careful sampling and control for confounders; the literature cited here shows no uniform conclusion that gay or lesbian people commit sex crimes at higher rates across the board [3] [5] [4].

7. Bottom line for readers and policy makers

Do homosexuals commit sex crimes at higher rates? Available large‑scale, government‑sourced victimization data show LGBT people are significantly more likely to be victims of violent and sexual crimes [1] [6] [7]. Available research on perpetration is mixed, varies by subgroup, and does not support a blanket assertion that homosexuals as a category commit more sex crimes; claims to the contrary often rely on older, limited, or methodologically weak studies [3] [8] [5]. Policy and reporting should focus on reducing victimization, addressing systemic bias in the criminal legal system, and using rigorous, disaggregated data when assessing perpetration [9] [10].

Want to dive deeper?
What do peer-reviewed studies say about sexual offending rates among LGBT+ populations compared to heterosexual populations?
How do reporting biases and law enforcement practices affect statistics on sex crimes by sexual orientation?
Are there differences in rates of sexual offenses within subgroups of the LGBTQ+ community (e.g., gay men, lesbians, bisexual people)?
How do societal stigma and criminalization impact access to support and data collection for LGBTQ+ survivors and perpetrators?
What prevention and treatment approaches are effective for sexual offending that are inclusive of LGBTQ+ individuals?