Do ice agents have more criminal records against them than the immigrants they arrest
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available reporting shows that a large and growing share of people arrested by ICE in 2025 had no criminal convictions — national analyses find roughly one-third to three-quarters of arrests involved people without criminal records depending on dataset and place (for example, TRAC found only 3% with convictions in a recent window while some local reporting shows 48–74% without records) [1] [2] [3]. Local analyses in San Diego and other big-city operations show majorities of arrestees had no criminal history — San Diego/Imperial counties: 58% without criminal records; high‑profile city operations often exceeded 50% — while ICE and DHS emphasize arrests of dangerous criminals [4] [3] [5].
1. Arrests vs. officer records — what the data actually compare
The question asks if "ICE agents have more criminal records against them than the immigrants they arrest." None of the provided sources report counts of criminal records for ICE agents themselves; the coverage focuses on the criminal histories of people ICE arrests and detains, not on ICE employees’ arrest or conviction records. Available sources do not mention criminal-record comparisons between ICE personnel and arrestees (not found in current reporting).
2. National picture: a shift toward arresting people with no convictions
National analyses show the composition of ICE arrests shifted sharply in 2025 toward people without criminal convictions. TRAC’s analysis found that in a recent interval only about 3% of those arrested had convictions, and other national reporting says roughly one‑third of immigrants arrested nationwide had no criminal record — signaling policy and operational changes in who ICE is arresting [1] [3].
3. Local hotspots: high-profile operations arresting mostly people without convictions
In targeted city operations the share without criminal records is higher. The New York Times and other outlets reported that in high‑profile sweeps in Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington, D.C., and parts of Massachusetts more than half of arrestees had no criminal record [3]. In Northern California reporting, nearly half of those arrested in ICE’s area had no criminal record, and Mission Local cited TRAC data that about 74% in detention nationwide had no criminal history [2] [1].
4. San Diego and state-by-state variation
Local investigations underscore variation by jurisdiction. In San Diego and Imperial counties, inewsource reported almost 5,000 arrests through mid‑October 2025 and said 58% of those arrested had no criminal histories, illustrating how regional enforcement priorities and cooperation with local jails shape outcomes [4]. Prison Policy notes state differences — e.g., New Jersey had a larger share of arrestees with pending charges but no convictions compared with New York — showing the national aggregate masks local diversity [6].
5. Administration messaging vs. reported practice
The Trump administration frames operations as targeting "the worst of the worst," but multiple outlets found that many arrests do not fit that description: analyses show a larger share of arrests for immigration violations without criminal convictions than the administration’s messaging suggests [7] [8] [5]. The Independent and The Week explicitly contrast policy rhetoric with data showing a departure from earlier enforcement priorities under the prior administration [8] [5].
6. Caveats in the numbers and definitions
Different reports use distinct measures: "no criminal record," "no criminal conviction," and "pending charges" are not identical, and some datasets include transfers from local jails or custody arrests that reflect local booking practices [6] [1]. TRAC, Deportation Data Project, ICE public records and local reporters use different date ranges and coding choices; that explains why estimates range from about one‑third to as much as 74% lacking convictions or histories in different samples [1] [2] [3].
7. Alternative perspectives and official pushback
ICE and DHS releases highlighted in the reporting emphasize criminal‑enforcement successes — for example, ICE statements about multiagency criminal investigations and arrests tied to organized crime — and ICE press releases describe operations that did include people with violent or prior criminal arrests [9]. Those releases show that while many arrests involve people without convictions, the agency continues to conduct criminal investigations and publicizes those cases.
8. What this analysis does — and does not — settle
The provided sources establish that many people arrested by ICE in 2025 had no criminal convictions and that the share varies widely by place and operation [1] [3] [4]. They do not provide any data on criminal-record histories of ICE agents themselves, so any direct comparison — whether ICE agents have more criminal records than the people they arrest — cannot be answered from the available reporting (not found in current reporting). For that comparison, public records or independent vetting of ICE personnel would be required.