Do immigrants in the US commit more crimes than citizens?

Checked on December 17, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Multiple recent, peer-reviewed and government-linked analyses find that immigrants — including undocumented immigrants in Texas studies — have lower arrest, conviction and incarceration rates than U.S.-born residents; a landmark Texas analysis found undocumented immigrants were arrested at less than half the rate of native‑born citizens for violent and drug crimes and a quarter the rate for property crimes [1] [2]. State- and national-level work finds no positive link between immigrant population share and higher crime rates; several organizations report that rising immigration since the 1980s coincided with large, sustained declines in crime [3] [4] [5].

1. The big-picture data: immigration rose while crime fell

National trend data cited by analysts show that U.S. immigration increased while overall crime rates dropped substantially — for example, reports note immigrant share rose to roughly 13.9% by 2022 as total crime and violent crime fell, and regression analyses across all 50 states found no statistically significant correlation between immigrant share and total crime rates [3] [6].

2. Texas: the “natural experiment” that separates legal status

Texas is the principal U.S. jurisdiction that records arrests and convictions by immigration status; multiple independent analyses using Texas Department of Public Safety records (2012–2018) found undocumented immigrants had substantially lower felony arrest rates than native‑born citizens and legal immigrants across violent, property and drug offenses — including findings that undocumented people were arrested at less than half the rate for violent and drug crimes and roughly a quarter the rate for property crimes [7] [1] [2] [8].

3. Long-term, historical research weakens the immigration‑crime narrative

A multi‑century incarceration study assembled from decennial censuses and contemporary surveys shows immigrants have not been incarcerated at higher rates than U.S.-born people since about 1960 and that the incarceration gap has widened in recent decades, with immigrants substantially less likely to be incarcerated by 2019–2020 [9] [10] [11].

4. Multiple reputable organizations and think tanks converge on the same conclusion

Advocacy and research groups — including the American Immigration Council, Migration Policy Institute, National Institute of Justice summaries and the Brennan Center — summarize peer‑reviewed studies and government data to conclude immigration does not increase crime and that immigrants often have lower offending or incarceration rates than native‑born populations [3] [5] [7] [12].

5. Methodological caveats that matter for interpreting results

Researchers stress limits: arrest and conviction data are imperfect proxies for offending because of policing practices, reporting differences, and data gaps; many studies rely on Texas because few states record immigration status in criminal records; and national administrative datasets (e.g., ICE or CBP enforcement tallies) count “criminal aliens” differently and mix convictions, prior foreign convictions, and administrative removals [13] [14] [1]. These constraints are explicit in the literature and shape how confidently one can generalize from state studies to the whole country [1] [13].

6. Where political rhetoric and the data diverge

Recent enforcement operations and political claims emphasize immigrant criminality, but reporting on ICE arrest datasets shows a rising share of immigration arrests involve people with no prior criminal convictions; in one analysis the share of arrests with past violent convictions fell from 15% in 2024 to 5% by mid‑October [14]. Enforcement statistics therefore cannot be read as direct evidence that immigrants commit more crime overall without context [14] [13].

7. Alternative explanations researchers offer for lower immigrant crime rates

Authors of the long‑run incarceration work and policy analysts point to selection effects (people who migrate tend to be less crime‑prone), social and economic factors in immigrant communities, and measurement differences as plausible reasons immigrants have lower recorded offending; academic summaries list multiple hypotheses rather than a single causal claim [9] [15].

8. Bottom line for readers and policymakers

Current, high‑quality reporting and peer‑reviewed studies converge: available evidence does not show immigrants commit more crime than U.S.-born citizens and often shows lower arrest, conviction and incarceration rates for immigrant groups — a robust finding in Texas data, historical incarceration research, and multi‑state regression analyses [2] [9] [3]. Limitations persist because of data gaps, differing definitions, and enforcement practices; better, standardized data collection across jurisdictions would refine but, based on existing work, overturning the core conclusion would require strong contradictory evidence not present in the cited sources [1] [13].

If you want, I can summarize the key Texas study methods and numbers in plain language or compile specific citations and figures for use in a brief or presentation (sources: [2]; [1]; p1_s1).

Want to dive deeper?
How do crime rates compare between undocumented and documented immigrants in the US?
Do immigrants commit fewer violent crimes than native-born US citizens?
What do major studies and government data say about immigrant criminality trends since 2000?
How do socioeconomic factors and neighborhood composition affect crime rates among immigrant groups?
How have immigration enforcement policies impacted crime reporting and arrest statistics?