What are documented examples of far-right political violence in the US since 2020, including dates and convictions?

Executive summary — Clear, sourced, and concise: Four leaders of the Proud Boys and multiple members of the Oath Keepers were convicted for seditious conspiracy and related felony charges tied to the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol breach, with convictions announced in spring 2023; those prosecutions are the clearest, documented instances of organized far‑right political violence prosecuted at scale since 2020. Public databases and research programs exist to catalog extremist attacks and plots — notably the TEVUS database and the George Washington University Program on Extremism resources — but the provided materials do not enumerate a comprehensive incident-by-incident list of far‑right violence since 2020 beyond the January 6 prosecutions ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]}.

1. What the original claims assert and what the evidence actually documents, stripped to essentials: The user asked for documented examples of far‑right political violence in the United States since 2020, including dates and convictions. The available documentation in the provided materials confirms major federal prosecutions tied to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack: convictions of four Proud Boys leaders, including Henry “Enrique” Tarrio, for seditious conspiracy and related felonies announced in May 2023, and earlier convictions of Oath Keepers members reported in March–May 2023 for obstructing an official proceeding and related charges. Those prosecutions include felony convictions and lengthy sentences and constitute the most detailed, named examples in the supplied analyses ^{[1] [2] [3]}. The materials do not furnish a broader, dated roster of every far‑right violent incident or subsequent convictions across the 2020–2025 window.

2. Deep dive on the high‑profile cases prosecutors prioritized after January 6: Federal prosecutors pursued seditious conspiracy and obstruction charges against organized far‑right groups that planned, coordinated, or led the January 6 breach. The Department of Justice announced a May 2023 jury conviction of four Proud Boys leaders on seditious conspiracy counts tied to efforts to stop Congress from certifying the electoral vote, charging multiple felonies such as obstructing an official proceeding; media reporting mirrored and expanded on those facts and contextualized overlapping Oath Keepers prosecutions that produced convictions earlier in 2023, also involving prolonged prison terms for conspiratorial coordination and obstruction. These cases represent formal criminal findings and are the most concrete, well‑documented instances of far‑right violence leading to convictions in the given materials ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

3. What broader datasets and research resources are available but not fully mined here: The analyses reference at least three cataloging efforts: a global “List of terrorist incidents in 2024,” the George Washington University Program on Extremism “Attacks and Plots” resource, and the TEVUS (Terrorism and Extremist Violence in the United States) database. Those resources are designed to compile incidents, plots, and prosecutions over time, but the provided extracts do not supply the incident-level entries or conviction details for far‑right domestic events from 2020 onward. Researchers seeking a comprehensive list of dates and convictions should consult these datasets directly because they aim to capture a wider range of incidents than the high‑profile January 6 prosecutions highlighted here ^{[6] [4] [5]}.

4. Reconciling government releases and media reporting — what converges, where potential agendas appear: DOJ press releases and major media outlets both report the same convictions for Proud Boys and Oath Keepers in 2023, showing convergence on basic facts of charges, verdicts, and some sentences; DOJ material presents prosecutorial framing and the gravity of the federal offenses, while media coverage adds narrative context, defendants’ profiles, and broader political implications. The supplied analyses include a DOJ announcement and New York Times coverage; readers should note that government statements foreground law enforcement conclusions and public safety rationales, whereas media pieces may emphasize political and societal fallout. Both types of sources corroborate the core legal outcomes but serve different communicative roles, so cross‑checking both gives a fuller account ^{[1] [2]}.

5. Gaps, next steps, and how to obtain a complete incident-and-conviction list through 2025: The provided materials clearly document major January 6 prosecutions but do not enumerate other far‑right violent incidents since 2020 or list every related conviction. To build a comprehensive timeline with dates and judicial outcomes, consult the TEVUS database and the Program on Extremism attacks-and-plots resource for incident-level entries, and supplement with DOJ press releases and court dockets for conviction records. The supplied sources identify these repositories as the logical next steps but stop short of providing a finished, dated inventory; compiling a definitive list will require aggregating entries from those databases and confirming convictions via federal or state court records ^{[5] [4] [6] [1]}.