Which legal documents or court cases publicly list visitors to little st. james or the caribbean properties?

1. Court filings and civil complaints have been the clearest publicource for visitor allegations

Accusers’ court pleadings have explicitly alleged that specific people visited Little St. James; for example, Virginia Giuffre’s allegations that she was abused there appear in court filings from 2022 ^[1]. These court filings are public records in the civil cases where they were filed and are the primary documentary source naming incidents and, in some instances, naming individuals in connection with the island ^[1].

2. Evidence inventories and seized materials reference island documents but do not by themselves list visitors

The U.S. Department of Justice released a “first phase” of Epstein files containing an evidence list that included items described as a folder titled “LSJ logbook,” alongside photo albums and electronic media taken in investigations ^[2]. An inventory that names an item linked to Little St. James shows investigators sought materials that could record visitors, but the inventory itself (as reported) does not publish a full visitor log or a roster of names ^[2].

3. Government photography and video emerged from litigation in the U.S. Virgin Islands and congressional subpoenas

The House Oversight Committee publicly released previously unseen photos and video from Little St. James that it received from the V.I. Justice Department; the committee has also sought bank records and other communications via subpoenas to trace who frequented the island ^{[3] [4]}. Those visual materials do not show people in the released images, and the committee’s stated subpoenas targeted financial and communications records that could corroborate visitor lists ^{[3] [4]}.

4. Congressional and FOIA drives aim to extract more documentary records, including visitor-related material

Multiple outlets report lawmakers and advocates pushing for broader release of documents held by federal and V.I. authorities; the House Oversight Committee’s disclosures and its subpoena letters explicitly sought financial documents from banks to track flows and contacts that could reveal who visited or transacted with Epstein’s properties ^{[5] [4]}. Reporting notes deadlines and legislation pushing for fuller release of unclassified Epstein-related materials, which proponents say should include visitor logs and correspondence ^[5].

5. What is publicly available vs. what sources do not mention

Available reporting documents that are publicly cited: (a) accusers’ court filings that allege visits or incidents on Little St. James ^[1]; (b) government evidence lists and seized items that reference an “LSJ logbook” and photo albums ^[2]; and (c) House Oversight Committee releases of photos/videos and subpoena activity seeking bank records and communications ^{[3] [4]}. Available sources do not mention a comprehensive, government-published “visitor list” naming all people who visited Little St. James; they also do not publish a definitive, court-certified roster of island visitors drawn from an official log in the materials cited ^[2].

6. Conflicting claims and reporting cautions

News outlets and advocates have publicized names alleged to have visited the island over years; but reporting also records disputes and denials — e.g., some high-profile figures have denied island visits even as other sources cite flight logs or allegations ^{[6] [7]}. The recent image releases are described as “provid[ing] little to no new insight” in some outlets, underscoring that photos alone do not equate to authenticated visitor lists ^[7].

7. How to pursue verified, court-backed records going forward

To find court documents that may list visitors, researchers should track: (a) civil pleadings and deposition transcripts filed in U.S. Virgin Islands litigation and other civil suits (where accusers named locations and alleged participants) ^{[3] [1]}; (b) DOJ releases and evidence inventories tied to ongoing FOIA or statutory disclosure efforts ^{[2] [5]}; and (c) congressional committee productions and subpoena returns referenced in public committee letters ^{[4] [5]}. Public archives of these docketed filings and official committee releases are the proper sources for any names that appear in legal documents ^{[1] [3]}.

Limitations: this summary relies on the cited news reports and public committee statements; those sources do not reproduce a single, authoritative visitor log in full and do not list every document that may exist in closed investigative files ^{[1] [2] [4]}.